← All comparisons

CredScore vs MetaSleuth

MetaSleuth solved a real problem: following funds across seventeen Etherscan tabs. Its tracing graphs are genuinely good, its free tier is generous, and analysts at small firms recommend it to each other for a reason.

But a finished trace is not a finished investigation. Someone still decides — clear, review, or escalate — and writes the defensible version. CredScore automates that last mile: a deterministic scored verdict, every driver cited, exportable for the case file. The free tools show you the money. CredScore writes the conclusion you can defend.

Feature
CredScore
MetaSleuth
Core job
Scored risk verdict with a written, defensible rationale
Visual fund-flow tracing: map where the money went
Risk verdict
Deterministic 0-100 score, tier, Proceed / Review / Escalate on every walletADVANTAGE
No score — the graph informs a judgment you still make yourself
Time to conclusion
Structured verdict in under 15 secondsADVANTAGE
Tracing is fast; reaching and writing the conclusion is still manual
Audit artifact
Defensible Verdict Report, engine version pinned, PDF/Markdown export; sealed input capsules make verdicts replayableADVANTAGE
Graph screenshots and shared boards
Behavioral detection
Automatic: funding concentration, structural flow patterns, dormancy, counterfeit-token filteringADVANTAGE
Patterns are visible on the graph; recognizing them is the analyst's job
Flow visualization
Counterparty and flow summaries inside the verdict
Excellent interactive tracing graphs, purpose-built for following fundsADVANTAGE
Chain coverage
6 chains: Ethereum, Tron, Base, Arbitrum, Optimism, Polygon
Broad multi-chain tracing coverageADVANTAGE
Monitoring
Watchlist re-checks with drift alerts, daily
Address monitoring and alerts on traced flows
Pricing
$99/mo per analyst; first analysis free, no card
Free tier; paid plans for heavier use
Setup
Paste a wallet, verdict in seconds — no sales call
Self-serve, equally fast to start
The workflow
Trace in MetaSleuth. Decide with CredScore.

The strongest small-firm stack isn't one tool, it's a sequence: Etherscan for the raw record, MetaSleuth for the flow, CredScore for the scored verdict and the audit-ready report. Each does one job properly, and the whole stack costs less per month than a single enterprise platform costs per day.

Read the full stack guide →
The bottom line

Keep MetaSleuth for tracing — it's good and its free tier is real. Add CredScore when the trace is done and the decision starts. If your write-ups take longer than your traces, you already know which gap costs you more.

Try CredScore freeView pricing

Frequently asked questions

What is MetaSleuth used for?

MetaSleuth (built by BlockSec) is a visual fund-flow tracing tool: you enter an address and map where funds came from and went, across many chains, with labels on known entities. It's one of the most practical free-tier tools for manual crypto investigations, and a big upgrade over hopping between Etherscan tabs.

Does CredScore replace MetaSleuth?

No — they cover different halves of an investigation. MetaSleuth is for the middle (following the money); CredScore is for the end (the scored verdict and the document you file). Tracing shows you what happened. CredScore tells you what it means, with every driver cited, and seals the inputs so the verdict can be reproduced months later.

What's the best MetaSleuth alternative?

For visual tracing specifically, Breadcrumbs and Arkham are the closest alternatives, and all three have free tiers worth testing against your own cases. If what you actually need is a risk determination — a score, a recommendation, and audit-ready reasoning — that's a different product category, and it's what CredScore is built for.

Can I use MetaSleuth and CredScore together?

That's the intended workflow for a small team: trace the flow in MetaSleuth, then run the subject wallet through CredScore for the scored verdict and the case-file artifact. The combined stack costs a fraction of one enterprise seat.