CredScore Defensible Verdict Report
Verdict on 0xf437…02d4 ethereum
0xf4377eda661e04b6dda78969796ed31658d602d4
Compared to last analysis
Jul 5, 2026 →Score
-38
riskier
Tier
Unknown → High
Posture
— → Escalate
New drivers: High-confidence sanctions attribution, History capped by fetch limit, Balance unavailable
Verdict
Score
12/100
0 = maximum risk · 100 = clean
Tier
High
Decision posture
Escalate
Confidence
58%
Moderate — treat as directional
Escalate for deeper review
Executive summary
CredScore sees a 2.8-year-old wallet with at least 501 transfers. High-confidence sanctions attribution and History capped by fetch limit are severe enough to require escalation before any further interaction.
Wallet snapshot at analysis time
Transfers observed: 501
Wallet age: 2.8 years (1025 days)
Last activity: 473 days ago
Unique counterparties: 269
Sanctions exposure count: 0
Mixer-like interactions: 0
Bridge-like interactions: 0
Primary risk drivers
- High-confidence sanctions attributionhigh
- This wallet itself is on a sanctions watchlist (per the curated registry or OFAC SDN sync).
Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
- History capped by fetch limitmedium
- Transfers observed: At least 501
- History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 500)
Incomplete transfer coverage reduces confidence because observed totals may be lower bounds.
- Balance unavailablemedium
- Native balance: Unknown
Missing core metrics reduce confidence and increase the chance of misclassification.
Offsetting factors considered
- Established history. Wallet age: 2.8y (observed)
- Material attribution coverage. Attributed interaction share: 100% (20% high-confidence)
- Recognizable exchange or protocol context. Observed label: USDT Token; Observed label: transfer; Observed label: circle
Sanctioned counterparty interactions
0xf4377eda661e04b6dda78969796ed31658d602d4↗0xf4377eda661e04b6dda78969796ed31658d602d4· GARANTEX EUROPE OU · OFAC_SDNSynced from OFAC SDN CSV
Sensitivity — what would change this verdict
- Improved transaction coverage could materially change activity-based interpretation and increase confidence.
- Fresh activity could change this classification because the current signal is not recent.
- Improved data coverage for missing core metrics would likely improve confidence and may affect the trust score.
Observed entity / protocol context
USDT Tokentransfercirclemakertether
Analyst notes
Loading…
Analyst notes
[no analyst notes added]