Verdict on 0x96d0…aeff ethereum

0x96d0471a061593e20f0ebc8c5b8b2d056862aeff

Verdict

Score

75/100

0 = maximum risk · 100 = clean

Tier

Low

Decision posture

Review

Confidence

38%

Low — thin signal, verify with your other tools

Review before proceeding

Executive summary

CredScore sees a 1.5-year-old wallet with at least 501 transfers. History capped by fetch limit and Balance unavailable warrant manual review before this case is treated as routine. Observed entity context: USDT Token, USDC Token.

Wallet snapshot at analysis time

Transfers observed: 501

Wallet age: 1.5 years (555 days)

Last activity: 0 days ago

Unique counterparties: 458

Sanctions exposure count: 0

Mixer-like interactions: 0

Bridge-like interactions: 0

Primary risk drivers

History capped by fetch limitmedium
- Transfers observed: At least 501
- History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 500)
Incomplete transfer coverage reduces confidence because observed totals may be lower bounds.
Balance unavailablemedium
- Native balance: Unknown
Missing core metrics reduce confidence and increase the chance of misclassification.
Bursty activity patternmedium
- Average observed activity: 197.3 tx/day
A compressed activity window can indicate non-routine behavior and deserves added caution.

Offsetting factors considered

Established history. Wallet age: 1.5y (observed)
Recognizable exchange or protocol context. Observed label: USDT Token; Observed label: USDC Token; Observed label: DAI Token
Recognizable protocol attribution. Observed protocol: USDT contract; Observed protocol: tether; Observed protocol: circle

Sensitivity — what would change this verdict

Improved transaction coverage could materially change activity-based interpretation and increase confidence.
Improved data coverage for missing core metrics would likely improve confidence and may affect the trust score.

Observed entity / protocol context

USDT TokenUSDC TokenDAI Tokencirclemaker

Analyst notes

Loading…

Analyst notes

[no analyst notes added]