View graphTrace money flowUse Print → “Save as PDF” in your browser’s print dialog.
CredScore Defensible Verdict Report
Engine version: 1.0.0 · Analysis ran: Sun, 23 Aug 2026 09:00:25 GMT

Verdict on 0x04db…bacf ethereum

0x04dba1194ee10112fe6c3207c0687def0e78bacf
Score
12/100
0 = maximum risk · 100 = clean
Tier
High
Decision posture
Escalate
Confidence
54%
Low — thin signal, verify with your other tools
Escalate for deeper review

CredScore sees a 7.3-year-old wallet with 73 transfers. High-confidence sanctions attribution and Sanctions-sensitive exposure context are severe enough to require escalation before any further interaction.

Transfers observed: 73
Wallet age: 7.3 years (2649 days)
Last activity: 447 days ago
Unique counterparties: 62
Sanctions exposure count: 4
Mixer-like interactions: 0
Bridge-like interactions: 0
  1. High-confidence sanctions attributionhigh
    • This wallet itself is on a sanctions watchlist (per the curated registry or OFAC SDN sync).

    Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.

  2. Sanctions-sensitive exposure contexthigh
    • Sanctioned counterparty interactions observed: 4

    Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.

  3. Source return flow detectedmedium
    • Source return count: 2
    • Repeated amount-band recirculation: 2
    • Funding dependency concentration: 2%
    • Multi-hop pressure: 22/100

    Observed sources later reappear as return destinations, which reduces legibility and suggests recirculating flow rather than clean one-direction settlement.

  • Established history. Wallet age: 7.3y (observed)
  • Observable activity present. Transfers observed: 73
  • Moderately distributed counterparties. Unique counterparties observed: 62
  • Fresh activity could change this classification because the current signal is not recent.
  • Improved data coverage for missing core metrics would likely improve confidence and may affect the trust score.
  • The dormancy-reactivation pattern warrants direct inquiry, understanding what triggered resumed activity would substantially clarify the current behavioral picture.
Loading…

[no analyst notes added]

This report is decision support, not a final determination. CredScore evaluates public on-chain activity using a deterministic scoring engine. The verdict above reflects engine output at the analysis timestamp shown; subsequent on-chain activity is not reflected.

Report token: 99cWsKW6TcA · Generated by CredScore at credscore.us/report/99cWsKW6TcA