CredScore Defensible Verdict Report
Verdict on 0xd097…3472 eth-mainnet
0xd0975b32cea532eadddfc9c60481976e39db3472
Verdict
Score
12/100
0 = maximum risk · 100 = clean
Tier
High
Decision posture
Escalate
Confidence
26%
Low — thin signal, verify with your other tools
Escalate for deeper review
Executive summary
CredScore sees a 3.5-year-old wallet with 1 transfers. High-confidence sanctions attribution and Stale recent activity are severe enough to require escalation before any further interaction.
Wallet snapshot at analysis time
Transfers observed: 1
Wallet age: 3.5 years (1280 days)
Last activity: 1280 days ago
Unique counterparties: 1
Sanctions exposure count: 0
Mixer-like interactions: 0
Bridge-like interactions: 0
Primary risk drivers
- High-confidence sanctions attributionhigh
- This wallet itself is on a sanctions watchlist (per the curated registry or OFAC SDN sync).
Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
- Stale recent activitymedium
- Days since last observed activity: 1280
A long gap since last activity reduces the freshness of the observable signal.
- self_sanctioned_addresshigh
- This wallet itself appears on the OFAC SDN list or the curated sanctions registry.
This signal materially affects trust assessment under generalized on-chain metrics.
Offsetting factors considered
- Established history. Wallet age: 3.5y (observed)
- Observable activity present. Transfers observed: 1
Sanctioned counterparty interactions
0xd0975b32cea532eadddfc9c60481976e39db3472↗0xd0975b32cea532eadddfc9c60481976e39db3472· OFAC SDN-listed address · OFAC_SDNOFAC SDN ETH list (maintained mirror); not present in truncated CSV
Sensitivity — what would change this verdict
- Additional observable transactions could materially change activity-based classification and improve confidence.
- Fresh activity could change this classification because the current signal is not recent.
Analyst notes
Loading…
Analyst notes
[no analyst notes added]