View graphTrace money flowUse Print → “Save as PDF” in your browser’s print dialog.
CredScore Defensible Verdict Report
Engine version: 1.0.0 · Analysis ran: Fri, 28 Aug 2026 01:30:20 GMT

Verdict on 0x4022…0568 eth-mainnet

0x40225b91d29e27134bd81ab188fe318314ef0568
Score
61/100
0 = maximum risk · 100 = clean
Tier
Medium
Decision posture
Review
Confidence
76%
Moderate — treat as directional
Review before proceeding

CredScore sees a 5.9-year-old wallet with 71 transfers. Source return flow detected and Review-sensitive fan-out distribution pattern warrant manual review before this case is treated as routine. Observed entity context: ENS Base Registrar.

Transfers observed: 71
Wallet age: 5.9 years (2153 days)
Last activity: 145 days ago
Unique counterparties: 31
Sanctions exposure count: 0
Mixer-like interactions: 0
Bridge-like interactions: 3
  1. Source return flow detectedmedium
    • Source return count: 2
    • Linked recirculating counterparties: 1
    • Paired mirroring count: 1
    • Repeated amount-band recirculation: 1

    Observed sources later reappear as return destinations, which reduces legibility and suggests recirculating flow rather than clean one-direction settlement.

  2. Review-sensitive fan-out distribution patternmedium
    • Transfers observed: 71
    • Unique counterparties: 31
    • Top counterparty share: 17%

    A review-sensitive fan-out distribution pattern was detected. The structural heuristics indicate this wallet distributes funds to multiple distinct recipients in a compressed fashion that raises review priority when combined with other signals.

  3. Rapid outflow patternmedium
    • Rapid outbound events observed: 10

    Rapid outflow behavior can indicate routing, distribution, or non-routine operational flow that deserves review.

  • Established history. Wallet age: 5.9y (observed)
  • Observable activity present. Transfers observed: 71
  • Moderately distributed counterparties. Unique counterparties observed: 31
  • Off-chain context would be particularly valuable here, the detected structural patterns raise interpretive ambiguity that on-chain data alone cannot resolve.
  • The dormancy-reactivation pattern warrants direct inquiry, understanding what triggered resumed activity would substantially clarify the current behavioral picture.
ENS Base Registrar
Loading…

[no analyst notes added]

This report is decision support, not a final determination. CredScore evaluates public on-chain activity using a deterministic scoring engine. The verdict above reflects engine output at the analysis timestamp shown; subsequent on-chain activity is not reflected.

Report token: Guvg8qzEPKg · Generated by CredScore at credscore.us/report/Guvg8qzEPKg