CredScore Defensible Verdict Report
Verdict on 0x6f1c…8352 ethereum
0x6f1ca141a28907f78ebaa64fb83a9088b02a8352
Verdict
Score
12/100
0 = maximum risk · 100 = clean
Tier
High
Decision posture
Escalate
Confidence
62%
Moderate — treat as directional
Escalate for deeper review
Executive summary
CredScore sees a 5.0-year-old wallet with at least 501 transfers. High-confidence sanctions attribution and Sanctions-sensitive exposure context are severe enough to require escalation before any further interaction.
Wallet snapshot at analysis time
Transfers observed: 501
Wallet age: 5.0 years (1838 days)
Last activity: 441 days ago
Unique counterparties: 133
Sanctions exposure count: 1
Mixer-like interactions: 0
Bridge-like interactions: 0
Primary risk drivers
- High-confidence sanctions attributionhigh
- This wallet itself is on a sanctions watchlist (per the curated registry or OFAC SDN sync).
Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
- Sanctions-sensitive exposure contexthigh
- Sanctioned counterparty interactions observed: 1
- Observed labels: USDT Token, transfer, circle
Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
- History capped by fetch limitmedium
- Transfers observed: At least 501
- History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 500)
Incomplete transfer coverage reduces confidence because observed totals may be lower bounds.
Offsetting factors considered
- Established history. Wallet age: 5.0y (observed)
- Material attribution coverage. Attributed interaction share: 100% (47% high-confidence)
- High-confidence label coverage. High-confidence attributed share: 47%
Sanctioned counterparty interactions
0x6f1ca141a28907f78ebaa64fb83a9088b02a8352↗0x6f1ca141a28907f78ebaa64fb83a9088b02a8352· OFAC SDN-listed address · OFAC_SDNOFAC SDN ETH list (maintained mirror); not present in truncated CSV0x5512d943ed1f7c8a43f3435c85f7ab68b30121b0↗0x5512d943ed1f7c8a43f3435c85f7ab68b30121b0· OFAC SDN-listed address · OFAC_SDNOFAC SDN ETH list (maintained mirror); not present in truncated CSV
Sensitivity — what would change this verdict
- Improved transaction coverage could materially change activity-based interpretation and increase confidence.
- Fresh activity could change this classification because the current signal is not recent.
- Improved data coverage for missing core metrics would likely improve confidence and may affect the trust score.
Observed entity / protocol context
USDT TokentransfercircletetherUSDC Token
Analyst notes
Loading…
Analyst notes
[no analyst notes added]