CredScore Defensible Verdict Report
Verdict on 0x96ca…cd7e ethereum
0x96ca003cb319b5024125154a94a7911ef898cd7e
Compared to last analysis
Sep 6, 2026 →Score
-44
riskier
Tier
Medium → High
Posture
Review → Escalate
New drivers: Sanctions-sensitive exposure context, High-confidence sanctions attribution
Cleared drivers: Review-sensitive fan-out distribution pattern, Balance unavailable
Verdict
Score
12/100
0 = maximum risk · 100 = clean
Tier
High
Decision posture
Escalate
Confidence
44%
Low — thin signal, verify with your other tools
Escalate for deeper review
Executive summary
CredScore sees a 5.4-year-old wallet with at least 501 transfers. Sanctions-sensitive exposure context and High-confidence sanctions attribution are severe enough to require escalation before any further interaction.
Wallet snapshot at analysis time
Transfers observed: 501
Wallet age: 5.4 years (1988 days)
Last activity: 1541 days ago
Unique counterparties: 8
Sanctions exposure count: 96
Mixer-like interactions: 0
Bridge-like interactions: 0
Primary risk drivers
- Sanctions-sensitive exposure contexthigh
- Sanctioned counterparty interactions observed: 96
- Observed labels: OFAC Sanctioned: Lazarus Group
Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
- High-confidence sanctions attributionhigh
- Sanctioned counterparty interactions observed: 96
Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
- History capped by fetch limitmedium
- Transfers observed: At least 501
- History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 500)
Incomplete transfer coverage reduces confidence because observed totals may be lower bounds.
Offsetting factors considered
- Established history. Wallet age: 5.4y (observed)
- Moderately distributed counterparties. Unique counterparties observed: 8
Sanctioned counterparty interactions
0xd882cfc20f52f2599d84b8e8d58c7fb62cfe344b↗0xd882cfc20f52f2599d84b8e8d58c7fb62cfe344b· KARASAVIDI · OFAC_SDNSynced from OFAC SDN CSV
Sensitivity — what would change this verdict
- Improved transaction coverage could materially change activity-based interpretation and increase confidence.
- Fresh activity could change this classification because the current signal is not recent.
- Improved data coverage for missing core metrics would likely improve confidence and may affect the trust score.
- Stronger counterparty attribution coverage could materially improve interpretability and sharpen the current score.
- Off-chain context would be particularly valuable here, the detected structural patterns raise interpretive ambiguity that on-chain data alone cannot resolve.
Observed entity / protocol context
OFAC Sanctioned: Lazarus Group
Analyst notes
Loading…
Analyst notes
[no analyst notes added]