CredScore Defensible Verdict Report
Verdict on 0x6ffc…bb24 ethereum
0x6ffc32a741af81a9b5dfd12b6aa1bafa1e60bb24
Verdict
Score
21/100
0 = maximum risk · 100 = clean
Tier
High
Decision posture
Escalate
Confidence
44%
Low — thin signal, verify with your other tools
Escalate for deeper review
Executive summary
CredScore sees a 7.7-year-old wallet with 32 transfers. Sanctions-sensitive exposure context and Balance unavailable are severe enough to require escalation before any further interaction.
Wallet snapshot at analysis time
Transfers observed: 32
Wallet age: 7.7 years (2828 days)
Last activity: 467 days ago
Unique counterparties: 21
Sanctions exposure count: 1
Mixer-like interactions: 0
Bridge-like interactions: 0
Primary risk drivers
- Sanctions-sensitive exposure contexthigh
- Sanctioned counterparty interactions observed: 1
Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
- Balance unavailablemedium
- Native balance: Unknown
Missing core metrics reduce confidence and increase the chance of misclassification.
- Stale recent activitymedium
- Days since last observed activity: 467
A long gap since last activity reduces the freshness of the observable signal.
Offsetting factors considered
- Established history. Wallet age: 7.7y (observed)
- Observable activity present. Transfers observed: 32
- Moderately distributed counterparties. Unique counterparties observed: 21
Sanctioned counterparty interactions
0xefe301d259f525ca1ba74a7977b80d5b060b3cca↗0xefe301d259f525ca1ba74a7977b80d5b060b3cca· OFAC SDN-listed address · OFAC_SDNOFAC SDN ETH list (maintained mirror); not present in truncated CSV
Sensitivity — what would change this verdict
- Fresh activity could change this classification because the current signal is not recent.
- Improved data coverage for missing core metrics would likely improve confidence and may affect the trust score.
Analyst notes
Loading…
Analyst notes
[no analyst notes added]