CredScore Defensible Verdict Report
Verdict on 0x8576…353c ethereum
0x8576acc5c05d6ce88f4e49bf65bdf0c62f91353c
Compared to last analysis
Jul 5, 2026 →Score
-38
riskier
Tier
Unknown → High
Posture
— → Escalate
New drivers: High-confidence sanctions attribution, Repeated amount-band recirculation, Balance unavailable
Verdict
Score
12/100
0 = maximum risk · 100 = clean
Tier
High
Decision posture
Escalate
Confidence
44%
Low — thin signal, verify with your other tools
Escalate for deeper review
Executive summary
CredScore sees a 8.6-year-old wallet with 31 transfers. High-confidence sanctions attribution and Repeated amount-band recirculation are severe enough to require escalation before any further interaction.
Wallet snapshot at analysis time
Transfers observed: 31
Wallet age: 8.6 years (3138 days)
Last activity: 222 days ago
Unique counterparties: 8
Sanctions exposure count: 0
Mixer-like interactions: 0
Bridge-like interactions: 0
Primary risk drivers
- High-confidence sanctions attributionhigh
- This wallet itself is on a sanctions watchlist (per the curated registry or OFAC SDN sync).
Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
- Repeated amount-band recirculationmedium
- Repeated amount-band recirculation: 3
- Funding dependency concentration: 25%
- Multi-hop pressure: 22/100
Repeated reuse of the same transfer size bands across a narrow routing set can indicate mechanical flow or recirculation rather than broad organic usage.
- Balance unavailablemedium
- Native balance: Unknown
Missing core metrics reduce confidence and increase the chance of misclassification.
Offsetting factors considered
- Established history. Wallet age: 8.6y (observed)
- Observable activity present. Transfers observed: 31
- Moderately distributed counterparties. Unique counterparties observed: 8
Sanctioned counterparty interactions
0x8576acc5c05d6ce88f4e49bf65bdf0c62f91353c↗0x8576acc5c05d6ce88f4e49bf65bdf0c62f91353c· OFAC SDN-listed address · OFAC_SDNOFAC SDN ETH list (maintained mirror); not present in truncated CSV
Sensitivity — what would change this verdict
- Fresh activity could change this classification because the current signal is not recent.
- Improved data coverage for missing core metrics would likely improve confidence and may affect the trust score.
Observed entity / protocol context
OFAC Sanctioned: Lazarus Grouptransfer
Analyst notes
Loading…
Analyst notes
[no analyst notes added]