CredScore Defensible Verdict Report
Verdict on 0xbc08…9944 ethereum
0xbc0809b46621d8b72de8eca1db195ebefcbd9944
Verdict
Score
27/100
0 = maximum risk · 100 = clean
Tier
High
Decision posture
Escalate
Confidence
58%
Moderate — treat as directional
Escalate for deeper review
Executive summary
CredScore sees a 1.1-year-old wallet with at least 501 transfers. History capped by fetch limit and Source return flow detected are severe enough to require escalation before any further interaction.
Wallet snapshot at analysis time
Transfers observed: 501
Wallet age: 1.1 years (406 days)
Last activity: 5 days ago
Unique counterparties: 27
Sanctions exposure count: 0
Mixer-like interactions: 0
Bridge-like interactions: 0
Primary risk drivers
- History capped by fetch limitmedium
- Transfers observed: At least 501
- History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 500)
Incomplete transfer coverage reduces confidence because observed totals may be lower bounds.
- Source return flow detectedmedium
- Source return count: 4
- Linked recirculating counterparties: 3
- Paired mirroring count: 3
- Repeated amount-band recirculation: 2
Observed sources later reappear as return destinations, which reduces legibility and suggests recirculating flow rather than clean one-direction settlement.
- Linked counterparty recirculationmedium
- Source return count: 4
- Linked recirculating counterparties: 3
- Paired mirroring count: 3
- Repeated amount-band recirculation: 2
A small connected set of counterparties appears repeatedly on both sides of flow, which is consistent with recirculation rather than broad organic usage.
Offsetting factors considered
- Established history. Wallet age: 1.1y (observed)
- Moderately distributed counterparties. Unique counterparties observed: 27
- Material attribution coverage. Attributed interaction share: 100% (28% high-confidence)
Sanctioned counterparty interactions
0x67d40ee1a85bf4a4bb7ffae16de985e8427b6b45↗0x67d40ee1a85bf4a4bb7ffae16de985e8427b6b45· OFAC SDN-listed address · OFAC_SDNOFAC SDN ETH list (maintained mirror); not present in truncated CSV
Sensitivity — what would change this verdict
- Improved transaction coverage could materially change activity-based interpretation and increase confidence.
- Improved data coverage for missing core metrics would likely improve confidence and may affect the trust score.
Observed entity / protocol context
unlabeled counterpartyUSDT Token1inchcircletether
Analyst notes
Loading…
Analyst notes
[no analyst notes added]