CredScore Defensible Verdict Report
Verdict on 0xc931…5691 ethereum
0xc93113accfb88fc1b7ab832e3d5395e883535691
Verdict
Score
36/100
0 = maximum risk · 100 = clean
Tier
High
Decision posture
Escalate
Confidence
36%
Low — thin signal, verify with your other tools
Escalate for deeper review
Executive summary
CredScore sees a 11-month-old wallet with at least 92 transfers. Circular funding pattern and History capped by fetch limit are severe enough to require escalation before any further interaction.
Wallet snapshot at analysis time
Transfers observed: 92
Wallet age: 0.9 years (338 days)
Last activity: 281 days ago
Unique counterparties: 33
Sanctions exposure count: 0
Mixer-like interactions: 0
Bridge-like interactions: 0
Primary risk drivers
- Circular funding patternhigh
- Circular loop count: 2
- Source return count: 4
- Linked recirculating counterparties: 1
- Bidirectional cluster count: 1
Funds appear to move out and then return through a narrow set of counterparties within bounded windows. This can be consistent with circular funding, staged routing, or internal treasury cycling and should be reviewed directly.
- History capped by fetch limitmedium
- Transfers observed: At least 92
- History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 500)
Incomplete transfer coverage reduces confidence because observed totals may be lower bounds.
- Source return flow detectedmedium
- Circular loop count: 2
- Source return count: 4
- Linked recirculating counterparties: 1
- Bidirectional cluster count: 1
Observed sources later reappear as return destinations, which reduces legibility and suggests recirculating flow rather than clean one-direction settlement.
Offsetting factors considered
- Moderately distributed counterparties. Unique counterparties observed: 33
- Recognizable exchange or protocol context. Observed label: universal-router interaction; Observed label: Uniswap V2 Router; Observed label: universal-router
- Recognizable protocol attribution. Observed protocol: Wrapped Ether (WETH); Observed protocol: Uniswap V2 Router; Observed protocol: universal-router
Sensitivity — what would change this verdict
- Improved transaction coverage could materially change activity-based interpretation and increase confidence.
- Fresh activity could change this classification because the current signal is not recent.
- Improved data coverage for missing core metrics would likely improve confidence and may affect the trust score.
Observed entity / protocol context
universal-router interactionUniswap V2 Routeruniversal-routerWrapped Ether (WETH)
Analyst notes
Loading…
Analyst notes
[no analyst notes added]