View graphTrace money flowUse Print → “Save as PDF” in your browser’s print dialog.
CredScore Defensible Verdict Report
Engine version: · Analysis ran: Sun, 23 Aug 2026 01:29:07 GMT

Verdict on 0x388c…9297 eth-mainnet

0x388c818ca8b9251b393131c08a736a67ccb19297
Score
69/100
0 = maximum risk · 100 = clean
Tier
Low
Decision posture
Proceed
Confidence
50%
Low — thin signal, verify with your other tools
Proceed with normal caution

CredScore sees a 3.9-year-old wallet holding 12.1 ETH with at least 1,201 transfers with no dominant adverse drivers under current coverage. This case can proceed with normal caution.

Transfers observed: 1201
Wallet age: 3.9 years (1438 days)
Last activity: 0 days ago
Unique counterparties: 10
Sanctions exposure count: 0
Mixer-like interactions: 0
Bridge-like interactions: 0
  1. History capped by fetch limitmedium
    • Transfers observed: At least 1,201
    • History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 1,200)

    Incomplete transfer coverage reduces confidence because observed totals may be lower bounds.

  2. High inbound value concentrationmedium
    • Single source supplied 85% of inbound ETH value
    • Distinct inbound counterparties (all assets): 9

    A large share of inbound value is concentrated in a few transfers, which can indicate a single large unexplained windfall.

  3. Review-sensitive hub-and-spoke structuremedium
    • Transfers observed: At least 1,201
    • Unique counterparties: 10
    • Top counterparty share: 74%

    A review-sensitive hub-and-spoke structure was detected. The combination of broad counterparty set with high concentration and asymmetric flow pressure warrants closer structural review.

  • Established history. Wallet age: 3.9y (observed)
  • Moderately distributed counterparties. Unique counterparties observed: 10
  • Improved transaction coverage could materially change activity-based interpretation and increase confidence.
  • Stronger counterparty attribution coverage could materially improve interpretability and sharpen the current score.
  • Off-chain context would be particularly valuable here, the detected structural patterns raise interpretive ambiguity that on-chain data alone cannot resolve.
  • The dormancy-reactivation pattern warrants direct inquiry, understanding what triggered resumed activity would substantially clarify the current behavioral picture.
Loading…

[no analyst notes added]

This report is decision support, not a final determination. CredScore evaluates public on-chain activity using a deterministic scoring engine. The verdict above reflects engine output at the analysis timestamp shown; subsequent on-chain activity is not reflected.

Report token: _QGKV4PCsj8 · Generated by CredScore at credscore.us/report/_QGKV4PCsj8