View graphTrace money flowUse Print → “Save as PDF” in your browser’s print dialog.
CredScore Defensible Verdict Report
Engine version: 1.0.0 · Analysis ran: Fri, 28 Aug 2026 05:00:23 GMT

Verdict on 0xaa6b…a886 eth-mainnet

0xaa6b856fd7203116e6f354c05233915ff606a886
Verdict
Score
—
insufficient signal
Tier
Unclassified
Decision posture
Escalate
Confidence
26%
Low — thin signal, verify with your other tools
Escalate for deeper review
Why no score? This wallet’s on-chain activity is below the threshold CredScore needs to run behavioral profiling — usually because it has too few transfers, too little history, or all-inbound activity. Rerunning after more activity accrues may produce a scored verdict. The absence of a score is not the same as a clean read; it means the engine declined to guess.
Executive summary

CredScore sees a 4.1-year-old wallet with 2 transfers. Sanctions-sensitive exposure context and Stale recent activity are severe enough to require escalation before any further interaction.

Wallet snapshot at analysis time
Transfers observed: 2
Wallet age: 4.1 years (1505 days)
Last activity: 1504 days ago
Unique counterparties: 2
Sanctions exposure count: 1
Mixer-like interactions: 0
Bridge-like interactions: 0
Primary risk drivers
  1. Sanctions-sensitive exposure contexthigh
    • Sanctioned counterparty interactions observed: 1

    Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.

  2. Stale recent activitymedium
    • Days since last observed activity: 1504

    A long gap since last activity reduces the freshness of the observable signal.

  3. short_lived_walletmedium
    • Wallet age: 4.1y
    • Transfers observed: 2
    • Native balance: 0 ETH

    This signal materially affects trust assessment under generalized on-chain metrics.

Offsetting factors considered
  • Established history. Wallet age: 4.1y (observed)
  • Observable activity present. Transfers observed: 2
Sanctioned counterparty interactions
Sensitivity — what would change this verdict
  • Additional observable transactions could materially change activity-based classification and improve confidence.
  • Fresh activity could change this classification because the current signal is not recent.
Analyst notes
Loading…
Analyst notes

[no analyst notes added]

This report is decision support, not a final determination. CredScore evaluates public on-chain activity using a deterministic scoring engine. The verdict above reflects engine output at the analysis timestamp shown; subsequent on-chain activity is not reflected.

Report token: lcmIm1-T5HY · Generated by CredScore at credscore.us/report/lcmIm1-T5HY