CredScore Defensible Verdict Report
Verdict on 0x5512…21b0 ethereum
0x5512d943ed1f7c8a43f3435c85f7ab68b30121b0
Verdict
Score
12/100
0 = maximum risk · 100 = clean
Tier
High
Decision posture
Escalate
Confidence
50%
Low — thin signal, verify with your other tools
Escalate for deeper review
Executive summary
CredScore sees a 5.3-year-old wallet with at least 501 transfers. High-confidence sanctions attribution and Sanctions-sensitive exposure context are severe enough to require escalation before any further interaction.
Wallet snapshot at analysis time
Transfers observed: 501
Wallet age: 5.3 years (1934 days)
Last activity: 56 days ago
Unique counterparties: 285
Sanctions exposure count: 2
Mixer-like interactions: 0
Bridge-like interactions: 0
Primary risk drivers
- High-confidence sanctions attributionhigh
- This wallet itself is on a sanctions watchlist (per the curated registry or OFAC SDN sync).
Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
- Sanctions-sensitive exposure contexthigh
- Sanctioned counterparty interactions observed: 2
- Observed labels: Ethereum Foundation, Wrapped Ether (WETH)
Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
- History capped by fetch limitmedium
- Transfers observed: At least 501
- History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 500)
Incomplete transfer coverage reduces confidence because observed totals may be lower bounds.
Offsetting factors considered
- Established history. Wallet age: 5.3y (observed)
- Recognizable exchange or protocol context. Observed label: Ethereum Foundation; Observed label: Wrapped Ether (WETH)
- Recognizable protocol attribution. Observed protocol: Ethereum Foundation; Observed protocol: Wrapped Ether (WETH); Observed protocol: Null / Burn Address
Sanctioned counterparty interactions
0x5512d943ed1f7c8a43f3435c85f7ab68b30121b0↗0x5512d943ed1f7c8a43f3435c85f7ab68b30121b0· OFAC SDN-listed address · OFAC_SDNOFAC SDN ETH list (maintained mirror); not present in truncated CSV0x48549a34ae37b12f6a30566245176994e17c6b4a↗0x48549a34ae37b12f6a30566245176994e17c6b4a· OFAC SDN-listed address · OFAC_SDNOFAC SDN ETH list (maintained mirror); not present in truncated CSV0xc455f7fd3e0e12afd51fba5c106909934d8a0e4a↗0xc455f7fd3e0e12afd51fba5c106909934d8a0e4a· OFAC SDN-listed address · OFAC_SDNOFAC SDN ETH list (maintained mirror); not present in truncated CSV
Sensitivity — what would change this verdict
- Improved transaction coverage could materially change activity-based interpretation and increase confidence.
- Improved data coverage for missing core metrics would likely improve confidence and may affect the trust score.
- Off-chain context would be particularly valuable here, the detected structural patterns raise interpretive ambiguity that on-chain data alone cannot resolve.
Observed entity / protocol context
Ethereum FoundationWrapped Ether (WETH)
Analyst notes
Loading…
Analyst notes
[no analyst notes added]