CredScore Defensible Verdict Report
Verdict on 0x9f4c…7ea9 ethereum
0x9f4cda013e354b8fc285bf4b9a60460cee7f7ea9
Verdict
Score
12/100
0 = maximum risk · 100 = clean
Tier
High
Decision posture
Escalate
Confidence
34%
Low — thin signal, verify with your other tools
Escalate for deeper review
Executive summary
CredScore sees a 7.1-year-old wallet with 12 transfers. High-confidence sanctions attribution and Balance unavailable are severe enough to require escalation before any further interaction.
Wallet snapshot at analysis time
Transfers observed: 12
Wallet age: 7.1 years (2600 days)
Last activity: 1064 days ago
Unique counterparties: 8
Sanctions exposure count: 0
Mixer-like interactions: 0
Bridge-like interactions: 0
Primary risk drivers
- High-confidence sanctions attributionhigh
- This wallet itself is on a sanctions watchlist (per the curated registry or OFAC SDN sync).
Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
- Balance unavailablemedium
- Native balance: Unknown
Missing core metrics reduce confidence and increase the chance of misclassification.
- Stale recent activitymedium
- Days since last observed activity: 1064
A long gap since last activity reduces the freshness of the observable signal.
Offsetting factors considered
- Established history. Wallet age: 7.1y (observed)
- Observable activity present. Transfers observed: 12
- Moderately distributed counterparties. Unique counterparties observed: 8
Sanctioned counterparty interactions
0x9f4cda013e354b8fc285bf4b9a60460cee7f7ea9↗0x9f4cda013e354b8fc285bf4b9a60460cee7f7ea9· SOUTHFRONT · OFAC_SDNSynced from OFAC SDN CSV
Sensitivity — what would change this verdict
- Fresh activity could change this classification because the current signal is not recent.
- Improved data coverage for missing core metrics would likely improve confidence and may affect the trust score.
Analyst notes
Loading…
Analyst notes
[no analyst notes added]