CredScore verdict
0xea9f…10c7eth-mainnet
Score
55
0 = max risk · 100 = clean
Medium riskReviewConfidence:84%
Review before proceeding
CredScore sees a 4.9-year-old wallet with 186 transfers. DEX-routed pass-through pattern and Rapid outflow pattern warrant manual review before this case is treated as routine. Observed entity context: Metamask Swaps, Uniswap V3 Router.
Wallet snapshot
Wallet age
4.9 years
Transfers observed
186
Native balance
0.0000 ETH
Last activity
9 days ago
Counterparties
85
Primary risk drivers
DEX-routed pass-through pattern
Single inbound source supplied 75% of inbound value · DEX + aggregator routing share: 54% of activity · Flow directionality: heavily one-sided (balance score 0.01)
A dominant share of the wallet's inbound value came from a single source, was routed through DEX or aggregator swap activity, and was drained from the wallet rather than retained. This is the laundering fingerprint observed on documented social-engineering theft cases: a large victim transfer arrives, gets fragmented into many DEX swaps to convert and obscure the asset trail, and the wallet is emptied. It is also consistent with one-shot legitimate behavior (an ICO recipient or grant payee cashi
Rapid outflow pattern
Rapid outbound events observed: 90
Rapid outflow behavior can indicate routing, distribution, or non-routine operational flow that deserves review.
Dense contract interaction pattern
Unique contracts observed: 93 · Contract interaction density: 0.50 · Observed labels: Metamask Swaps, Uniswap V3 Router, WETH Token
Heavy interaction with many contracts raises complexity and can increase behavioral uncertainty, although this may be normal for protocol-native wallets.
Observed entity context
Labels
Metamask SwapsUniswap V3 RouterWETH Tokenapproveuniswap
Protocols
Uniswap V3 Positions NFTmetamaskuniswapwrapped-ethUniswap UNI Token
Offsetting factors
Established history
Wallet age: 4.9y (observed)
Observable activity present
Transfers observed: 186
Moderately distributed counterparties
Unique counterparties observed: 85
Analyst briefing
Executive Risk Verdict
This 4.9-year-old address presents moderate counterparty risk. The leading concerns are DEX-routed pass-through pattern and Rapid outflow pattern, which warrant manual review before this case is treated as routine.
Decision Posture
Review before proceeding. This case is not an automatic stop, but the current signal mix or confidence level is not strong enough to treat it as routine without human review.
Primary Risk Drivers
DEX-routed pass-through pattern Single inbound source supplied 75% of inbound value DEX + aggregator routing share: 54% of activity Flow directionality: heavily one-sided (balance score 0.01) A dominant share of the wallet's inbound value came from a single source, was routed through DEX or aggregator swap activity, and was drained from the wallet rather than retained. This is the laundering fingerprint observed on documented social-engineering theft cases: a large victim transfer arrives, gets fragmented into many DEX swaps to convert and obscure the asset trail, and the wallet is emptied. It is also consistent with one-shot legitimate behavior (an ICO recipient or grant payee cashing out via DEX), so it warrants review until the funding-source provenance is established.
Rapid outflow pattern
Rapid outbound events observed: 90
Rapid outflow behavior can indicate routing, distribution, or non-routine operational flow that deserves review.
Dense contract interaction pattern
Unique contracts observed: 93
Contract interaction density: 0.50
Observed labels: Metamask Swaps, Uniswap V3 Router, WETH Token
Heavy interaction with many contracts raises complexity and can increase behavioral uncertainty, although this may be normal for protocol-native wallets.
Offsetting Factors
Established history Wallet age: 4.9y (observed)
Observable activity present
Transfers observed: 186
Moderately distributed counterparties
Unique counterparties observed: 85
Structural Pattern Observations
Fan-out distribution (medium confidence) The observed flow pattern is consistent with organized distribution behavior, but recognizable exchange or protocol context partially normalizes the structure and makes a benign operational explanation more plausible.
Behavior Distribution
Exchange-related interactions: 5% of observed activity. DEX-related interactions: 40% of observed activity. Router / aggregator interactions: 13% of observed activity. Attributed interactions: 100% of observed activity. High-confidence attributed interactions: 22% of observed activity.
Observed Entity / Protocol Context
Metamask Swaps Uniswap V3 Router WETH Token approve uniswap
Observed Protocol Attribution
Uniswap V3 Positions NFT metamask uniswap wrapped-eth Uniswap UNI Token
Confidence Statement
Overall assessment confidence is high (84%), reflecting stronger sample depth, better coverage, and more stable observable behavior.
Sensitivity notes
No immediate sensitivity drivers were identified from generalized metrics. Larger changes would likely come from stronger exposure and attribution intelligence.
For analysts
Generate a Defensible Verdict Report — engine version + timestamp baked in, exportable as PDF or copy-pasted as Markdown into a SAR narrative or case file.
Open report →
Run your own wallet through CredScore

Deterministic Ethereum wallet risk scoring with a full audit trail. Every signal has an explicit numeric weight, output is reproducible. Paste any wallet to see your own verdict.

First analysis is free, no credit card. Or see pricing.
Shared Jun 21, 2026