CredScore verdict
0x071a…db95eth-mainnetScore
12
0 = max risk · 100 = clean
High riskEscalateConfidence:42%
Escalate for deeper review
CredScore sees a 1.1-year-old wallet with 8 transfers. Sanctions-sensitive exposure context and High-confidence sanctions attribution are severe enough to require escalation before any further interaction.
Wallet snapshot
Wallet age
1.1 years
Transfers observed
8
Native balance
0.0000 ETH
Last activity
1.0 years ago
Counterparties
7
Primary risk drivers
Sanctions-sensitive exposure context
Sanctioned counterparty interactions observed: 1 · Observed labels: USDC Token, circle, USDC contract
Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
High-confidence sanctions attribution
Sanctioned counterparty interactions observed: 1
Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
Stale recent activity
Days since last observed activity: 368
A long gap since last activity reduces the freshness of the observable signal.
Sanctioned counterparty interactions
Observed entity context
Labels
USDC TokencircleUSDC contract
Protocols
circleUSDC contract
Offsetting factors
Established history
Wallet age: 1.1y (observed)
Observable activity present
Transfers observed: 8
Moderately distributed counterparties
Unique counterparties observed: 7
Analyst briefing
Executive Risk Verdict
This address presents elevated counterparty risk. Sanctions-sensitive exposure context and High-confidence sanctions attribution compose adverse signal severe enough to justify escalation under current coverage.
Decision Posture
Escalate for deeper review. A specific high-risk signal combination was detected (sanctions self). This pattern is materially more concerning than any individual flag in isolation and requires human context to resolve correctly.
Primary Risk Drivers
Sanctions-sensitive exposure context Sanctioned counterparty interactions observed: 1 Observed labels: USDC Token, circle, USDC contract Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
High-confidence sanctions attribution
Sanctioned counterparty interactions observed: 1
Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
Stale recent activity
Days since last observed activity: 368
A long gap since last activity reduces the freshness of the observable signal.
Offsetting Factors
Established history Wallet age: 1.1y (observed)
Observable activity present
Transfers observed: 8
Moderately distributed counterparties
Unique counterparties observed: 7
Behavior Distribution
Attributed interactions: 100% of observed activity. High-confidence attributed interactions: 50% of observed activity.
Observed Entity / Protocol Context
USDC Token circle USDC contract
Observed Protocol Attribution
circle USDC contract
Confidence Statement
Overall assessment confidence is low (42%), constrained by limited coverage, short history, or sparse behavioral signal.
Sensitivity notes
Additional observable transactions could materially change activity-based classification and improve confidence.
Fresh activity could change this classification because the current signal is not recent.
For analysts
Generate a Defensible Verdict Report — engine version + timestamp baked in, exportable as PDF or copy-pasted as Markdown into a SAR narrative or case file.
Run your own wallet through CredScore
Deterministic Ethereum wallet risk scoring with a full audit trail. Every signal has an explicit numeric weight, output is reproducible. Paste any wallet to see your own verdict.
First analysis is free, no credit card. Or see pricing.
Shared Aug 28, 2026