CredScore verdict
0xd850…e10eeth-mainnetScore
12
0 = max risk · 100 = clean
High riskEscalateConfidence:80%
Escalate for deeper review
CredScore sees a 3.0-year-old wallet with at least 501 transfers. High-confidence sanctions attribution and History capped by fetch limit are severe enough to require escalation before any further interaction.
Wallet snapshot
Wallet age
3.0 years
Transfers observed
501
Native balance
0.0000 ETH
Last activity
1.4 years ago
Counterparties
155
Primary risk drivers
High-confidence sanctions attribution
This wallet itself is on a sanctions watchlist (per the curated registry or OFAC SDN sync).
Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
History capped by fetch limit
Transfers observed: At least 501 · History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 500)
Incomplete transfer coverage reduces confidence because observed totals may be lower bounds.
Rapid outflow pattern
Rapid outbound events observed: 129
Rapid outflow behavior can indicate routing, distribution, or non-routine operational flow that deserves review.
Sanctioned counterparty interactions
Observed entity context
Labels
USDT TokencirclemakertetherDAI Token
Protocols
tetherUSDT contractcirclemakerUSDC contract
Offsetting factors
Established history
Wallet age: 3.0y (observed)
Material attribution coverage
Attributed interaction share: 100% (26% high-confidence)
High-confidence label coverage
High-confidence attributed share: 26%
Analyst briefing
Executive Risk Verdict
This address presents elevated counterparty risk. High-confidence sanctions attribution and History capped by fetch limit compose adverse signal severe enough to justify escalation under current coverage.
Decision Posture
Escalate for deeper review. A specific high-risk signal combination was detected (sanctions self). This pattern is materially more concerning than any individual flag in isolation and requires human context to resolve correctly.
Primary Risk Drivers
High-confidence sanctions attribution This wallet itself is on a sanctions watchlist (per the curated registry or OFAC SDN sync). Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
History capped by fetch limit
Transfers observed: At least 501
History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 500)
Incomplete transfer coverage reduces confidence because observed totals may be lower bounds.
Rapid outflow pattern
Rapid outbound events observed: 129
Rapid outflow behavior can indicate routing, distribution, or non-routine operational flow that deserves review.
Offsetting Factors
Established history Wallet age: 3.0y (observed)
Material attribution coverage
Attributed interaction share: 100% (26% high-confidence)
High-confidence label coverage
High-confidence attributed share: 26%
Structural Pattern Observations
Fan-out distribution (medium confidence) The observed flow pattern is consistent with fan-out distribution behavior, where funds move outward across a broad recipient set in a compressed fashion. This can be consistent with legitimate treasury, payroll, or airdrop-style operations, but it deserves review when visibility is thin, the wallet is very new, or sensitive exposure is also present.
Behavior Distribution
Attributed interactions: 100% of observed activity. High-confidence attributed interactions: 26% of observed activity.
Observed Entity / Protocol Context
USDT Token circle maker tether DAI Token
Observed Protocol Attribution
tether USDT contract circle maker USDC contract
Confidence Statement
Overall assessment confidence is high (80%), reflecting stronger sample depth, better coverage, and more stable observable behavior.
Sensitivity notes
Improved transaction coverage could materially change activity-based interpretation and increase confidence.
Fresh activity could change this classification because the current signal is not recent.
For analysts
Generate a Defensible Verdict Report — engine version + timestamp baked in, exportable as PDF or copy-pasted as Markdown into a SAR narrative or case file.
Run your own wallet through CredScore
Deterministic Ethereum wallet risk scoring with a full audit trail. Every signal has an explicit numeric weight, output is reproducible. Paste any wallet to see your own verdict.
First analysis is free, no credit card. Or see pricing.
Shared Aug 27, 2026