CredScore verdict
0x2767…f482ethereumScore
54
0 = max risk · 100 = clean
Medium riskReviewConfidence:26%
Review before proceeding
CredScore sees a 16-day-old wallet with at least 44 transfers. History capped by fetch limit and High inbound value concentration warrant manual review before this case is treated as routine. Observed entity context: transfer, 1inch.
Wallet snapshot
Wallet age
15 days
Transfers observed
44
Last activity
4 days ago
Counterparties
38
Primary risk drivers
History capped by fetch limit
Transfers observed: At least 44 · History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 500)
Incomplete transfer coverage reduces confidence because observed totals may be lower bounds.
High inbound value concentration
Single source supplied >99% of inbound ETH value · Distinct inbound counterparties (all assets): 36
A large share of inbound value is concentrated in a few transfers, which can indicate a single large unexplained windfall.
Repeated amount-band recirculation
Repeated amount-band recirculation: 2 · Funding dependency concentration: 10% · Multi-hop pressure: 22/100
Repeated reuse of the same transfer size bands across a narrow routing set can indicate mechanical flow or recirculation rather than broad organic usage.
Observed entity context
Labels
transfer1inch1inch Router
Protocols
1inchUSDT contract
Offsetting factors
Moderately distributed counterparties
Unique counterparties observed: 38
Recognizable exchange or protocol context
Observed label: transfer · Observed label: 1inch · Observed label: 1inch Router
Recognizable protocol attribution
Observed protocol: 1inch · Observed protocol: USDT contract
Analyst briefing
Executive Risk Verdict
This 16-day-old address presents moderate counterparty risk. The leading concerns are History capped by fetch limit and High inbound value concentration, which warrant manual review before this case is treated as routine.
Decision Posture
Review before proceeding. This case is not an automatic stop, but the current signal mix or confidence level is not strong enough to treat it as routine without human review.
Primary Risk Drivers
History capped by fetch limit Transfers observed: At least 44 History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 500) Incomplete transfer coverage reduces confidence because observed totals may be lower bounds.
High inbound value concentration
Single source supplied >99% of inbound ETH value
Distinct inbound counterparties (all assets): 36
A large share of inbound value is concentrated in a few transfers, which can indicate a single large unexplained windfall.
Repeated amount-band recirculation
Repeated amount-band recirculation: 2
Funding dependency concentration: 10%
Multi-hop pressure: 22/100
Repeated reuse of the same transfer size bands across a narrow routing set can indicate mechanical flow or recirculation rather than broad organic usage.
Offsetting Factors
Moderately distributed counterparties Unique counterparties observed: 38
Recognizable exchange or protocol context
Observed label: transfer
Observed label: 1inch
Observed label: 1inch Router
Recognizable protocol attribution
Observed protocol: 1inch
Observed protocol: USDT contract
Behavior Distribution
DEX-related interactions: 2% of observed activity. Router / aggregator interactions: 2% of observed activity. Attributed interactions: 100% of observed activity, but only 2% resolved with high confidence, the remainder are unlabeled contract interactions, which is opacity rather than meaningful attribution coverage. High-confidence attributed interactions: 2% of observed activity.
Observed Entity / Protocol Context
transfer 1inch 1inch Router
Observed Protocol Attribution
1inch USDT contract
Confidence Statement
Overall assessment confidence is low (26%), constrained by limited coverage, short history, or sparse behavioral signal.
Sensitivity notes
Improved transaction coverage could materially change activity-based interpretation and increase confidence.
As more history accumulates, this address may stabilize into a clearer behavioral profile.
Improved data coverage for missing core metrics would likely improve confidence and may affect the trust score.
For analysts
Generate a Defensible Verdict Report — engine version + timestamp baked in, exportable as PDF or copy-pasted as Markdown into a SAR narrative or case file.
Run your own wallet through CredScore
Deterministic Ethereum wallet risk scoring with a full audit trail. Every signal has an explicit numeric weight, output is reproducible. Paste any wallet to see your own verdict.
First analysis is free, no credit card. Or see pricing.
Shared Aug 24, 2026