CredScore verdict
0x28c6…1d60ethereumScore
21
0 = max risk · 100 = clean
High riskEscalateConfidence:18%
Escalate for deeper review
CredScore sees a 2-day-old wallet with 14 transfers. Sanctions-sensitive exposure context and Very new wallet history are severe enough to require escalation before any further interaction.
Wallet snapshot
Wallet age
2 days
Transfers observed
14
Last activity
today
Counterparties
5
Primary risk drivers
Sanctions-sensitive exposure context
Sanctioned counterparty interactions observed: 1 · Observed labels: transfer
Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
Very new wallet history
Wallet age: 2 days
Very new wallets have limited observable history, increasing uncertainty and reducing confidence in behavior-based classification.
Balance unavailable
Native balance: Unknown
Missing core metrics reduce confidence and increase the chance of misclassification.
Sanctioned counterparty interactions
Observed entity context
Labels
transfer
Offsetting factors
Observable activity present
Transfers observed: 14
Moderately distributed counterparties
Unique counterparties observed: 5
Recognizable exchange or protocol context
Observed label: transfer
Analyst briefing
Executive Risk Verdict
This address presents elevated counterparty risk. Sanctions-sensitive exposure context and Very new wallet history compose adverse signal severe enough to justify escalation under current coverage.
Decision Posture
Escalate for deeper review. A specific high-risk signal combination was detected (sanctions exposure). This pattern is materially more concerning than any individual flag in isolation and requires human context to resolve correctly.
Primary Risk Drivers
Sanctions-sensitive exposure context Sanctioned counterparty interactions observed: 1 Observed labels: transfer Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
Very new wallet history
Wallet age: 2 days
Very new wallets have limited observable history, increasing uncertainty and reducing confidence in behavior-based classification.
Balance unavailable
Native balance: Unknown
Missing core metrics reduce confidence and increase the chance of misclassification.
Offsetting Factors
Observable activity present Transfers observed: 14
Moderately distributed counterparties
Unique counterparties observed: 5
Recognizable exchange or protocol context
Observed label: transfer
Behavior Distribution
Exchange-related interactions: 14% of observed activity. Attributed interactions: 100% of observed activity, but only 0% resolved with high confidence, the remainder are unlabeled contract interactions, which is opacity rather than meaningful attribution coverage. High-confidence attributed interactions: 0% of observed activity.
Observed Entity / Protocol Context
transfer
Confidence Statement
Overall assessment confidence is low (18%), constrained by limited coverage, short history, or sparse behavioral signal.
Sensitivity notes
As more history accumulates, this address may stabilize into a clearer behavioral profile.
Improved data coverage for missing core metrics would likely improve confidence and may affect the trust score.
For analysts
Generate a Defensible Verdict Report — engine version + timestamp baked in, exportable as PDF or copy-pasted as Markdown into a SAR narrative or case file.
Run your own wallet through CredScore
Deterministic Ethereum wallet risk scoring with a full audit trail. Every signal has an explicit numeric weight, output is reproducible. Paste any wallet to see your own verdict.
First analysis is free, no credit card. Or see pricing.
Shared Oct 10, 2026