CredScore verdict
0x1aaf…6bc0ethereum
Score
62
0 = max risk · 100 = clean
Medium riskReviewConfidence:66%
Review before proceeding
CredScore sees a 3.9-year-old wallet with 92 transfers. Source return flow detected and Repeated amount-band recirculation warrant manual review before this case is treated as routine. Observed entity context: USDT Token, Metamask Swaps.
Wallet snapshot
Wallet age
3.9 years
Transfers observed
92
Last activity
15 days ago
Counterparties
28
Primary risk drivers
Source return flow detected
Source return count: 3 · Repeated amount-band recirculation: 2 · Funding dependency concentration: 55% · Multi-hop pressure: 6/100
Observed sources later reappear as return destinations, which reduces legibility and suggests recirculating flow rather than clean one-direction settlement.
Repeated amount-band recirculation
Source return count: 3 · Repeated amount-band recirculation: 2 · Funding dependency concentration: 55% · Multi-hop pressure: 6/100
Repeated reuse of the same transfer size bands across a narrow routing set can indicate mechanical flow or recirculation rather than broad organic usage.
Balance unavailable
Native balance: Unknown
Missing core metrics reduce confidence and increase the chance of misclassification.
Observed entity context
Labels
USDT TokenMetamask SwapsDAI Tokencirclemaker
Protocols
USDT contracttethermetamaskmakeruniswap
Offsetting factors
Established history
Wallet age: 3.9y (observed)
Observable activity present
Transfers observed: 92
Moderately distributed counterparties
Unique counterparties observed: 28
Analyst briefing
Executive Risk Verdict
This 3.9-year-old address presents moderate counterparty risk. The leading concerns are Source return flow detected and Repeated amount-band recirculation, which warrant manual review before this case is treated as routine.
Decision Posture
Review before proceeding. This case is not an automatic stop, but the current signal mix or confidence level is not strong enough to treat it as routine without human review.
Primary Risk Drivers
Source return flow detected Source return count: 3 Repeated amount-band recirculation: 2 Funding dependency concentration: 55% Observed sources later reappear as return destinations, which reduces legibility and suggests recirculating flow rather than clean one-direction settlement.
Repeated amount-band recirculation
Source return count: 3
Repeated amount-band recirculation: 2
Funding dependency concentration: 55%
Repeated reuse of the same transfer size bands across a narrow routing set can indicate mechanical flow or recirculation rather than broad organic usage.
Balance unavailable
Native balance: Unknown
Missing core metrics reduce confidence and increase the chance of misclassification.
Offsetting Factors
Established history Wallet age: 3.9y (observed)
Observable activity present
Transfers observed: 92
Moderately distributed counterparties
Unique counterparties observed: 28
Structural Pattern Observations
Fan-out distribution (medium confidence) The observed flow pattern is consistent with fan-out distribution behavior, where funds move outward across a broad recipient set in a compressed fashion. This can be consistent with legitimate treasury, payroll, or airdrop-style operations, but it deserves review when visibility is thin, the wallet is very new, or sensitive exposure is also present.
Behavior Distribution
DEX-related interactions: 8% of observed activity. Router / aggregator interactions: 8% of observed activity. Attributed interactions: 100% of observed activity. High-confidence attributed interactions: 36% of observed activity.
Observed Entity / Protocol Context
USDT Token Metamask Swaps DAI Token circle maker
Observed Protocol Attribution
USDT contract tether metamask maker uniswap
Confidence Statement
Overall assessment confidence is moderate (66%), reflecting partial coverage with usable but still incomplete behavioral signal.
Sensitivity notes
Improved data coverage for missing core metrics would likely improve confidence and may affect the trust score.
For analysts
Generate a Defensible Verdict Report — engine version + timestamp baked in, exportable as PDF or copy-pasted as Markdown into a SAR narrative or case file.
Open report →
Run your own wallet through CredScore

Deterministic Ethereum wallet risk scoring with a full audit trail. Every signal has an explicit numeric weight, output is reproducible. Paste any wallet to see your own verdict.

First analysis is free, no credit card. Or see pricing.
Shared Aug 24, 2026