CredScore verdict
0x3048…c0d7ethereumScore
21
0 = max risk · 100 = clean
High riskEscalateConfidence:44%
Escalate for deeper review
CredScore sees a 9.2-year-old wallet with 45 transfers. Sanctions-sensitive exposure context and DEX-routed pass-through pattern are severe enough to require escalation before any further interaction.
Wallet snapshot
Wallet age
9.2 years
Transfers observed
45
Last activity
13 days ago
Counterparties
35
Primary risk drivers
Sanctions-sensitive exposure context
Sanctioned counterparty interactions observed: 1 · Observed labels: transfer, Wrapped Ether (WETH)
Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
DEX-routed pass-through pattern
Single inbound source supplied 97% of inbound value · Flow directionality: heavily one-sided (balance score 0.02)
A dominant share of the wallet's inbound value came from a single source, was routed through DEX or aggregator swap activity, and was drained from the wallet rather than retained. This is the laundering fingerprint observed on documented social-engineering theft cases: a large victim transfer arrives, gets fragmented into many DEX swaps to convert and obscure the asset trail, and the wallet is emptied. It is also consistent with one-shot legitimate behavior (an ICO recipient or grant payee cashing out via DEX), so it warrants review until the funding-source provenance is established.
High inbound value concentration
Single source supplied 97% of inbound ETH value · Distinct inbound counterparties (all assets): 27
A large share of inbound value is concentrated in a few transfers, which can indicate a single large unexplained windfall.
Sanctioned counterparty interactions
Observed entity context
Labels
transferWrapped Ether (WETH)
Protocols
Ethereum FoundationNull / Burn AddressWrapped Ether (WETH)
Offsetting factors
Established history
Wallet age: 9.2y (observed)
Observable activity present
Transfers observed: 45
Moderately distributed counterparties
Unique counterparties observed: 35
Analyst briefing
Executive Risk Verdict
This address presents elevated counterparty risk. Sanctions-sensitive exposure context and DEX-routed pass-through pattern compose adverse signal severe enough to justify escalation under current coverage.
Decision Posture
Escalate for deeper review. A specific high-risk signal combination was detected (sanctions exposure). This pattern is materially more concerning than any individual flag in isolation and requires human context to resolve correctly.
Primary Risk Drivers
Sanctions-sensitive exposure context Sanctioned counterparty interactions observed: 1 Observed labels: transfer, Wrapped Ether (WETH) Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
DEX-routed pass-through pattern
Single inbound source supplied 97% of inbound value
Flow directionality: heavily one-sided (balance score 0.02)
A dominant share of the wallet's inbound value came from a single source, was routed through DEX or aggregator swap activity, and was drained from the wallet rather than retained. This is the laundering fingerprint observed on documented social-engineering theft cases: a large victim transfer arrives, gets fragmented into many DEX swaps to convert and obscure the asset trail, and the wallet is emptied. It is also consistent with one-shot legitimate behavior (an ICO recipient or grant payee cashing out via DEX), so it warrants review until the funding-source provenance is established.
High inbound value concentration
Single source supplied 97% of inbound ETH value
Distinct inbound counterparties (all assets): 27
A large share of inbound value is concentrated in a few transfers, which can indicate a single large unexplained windfall.
Offsetting Factors
Established history Wallet age: 9.2y (observed)
Observable activity present
Transfers observed: 45
Moderately distributed counterparties
Unique counterparties observed: 35
Behavior Distribution
Attributed interactions: 100% of observed activity, but only 0% resolved with high confidence, the remainder are unlabeled contract interactions, which is opacity rather than meaningful attribution coverage. High-confidence attributed interactions: 0% of observed activity.
Observed Entity / Protocol Context
transfer Wrapped Ether (WETH)
Observed Protocol Attribution
Ethereum Foundation Null / Burn Address Wrapped Ether (WETH)
Confidence Statement
Overall assessment confidence is low (44%), constrained by limited coverage, short history, or sparse behavioral signal.
Sensitivity notes
Improved data coverage for missing core metrics would likely improve confidence and may affect the trust score.
For analysts
Generate a Defensible Verdict Report — engine version + timestamp baked in, exportable as PDF or copy-pasted as Markdown into a SAR narrative or case file.
Run your own wallet through CredScore
Deterministic Ethereum wallet risk scoring with a full audit trail. Every signal has an explicit numeric weight, output is reproducible. Paste any wallet to see your own verdict.
First analysis is free, no credit card. Or see pricing.
Shared Aug 22, 2026