CredScore verdict
0x5a54…91caeth-mainnetScore
40
0 = max risk · 100 = clean
Medium riskReviewConfidence:86%
Review before proceeding
CredScore sees a 4.6-year-old wallet with 222 transfers. High inbound value concentration and Source return flow detected warrant manual review before this case is treated as routine. Observed entity context: Uniswap Universal Router, Sushi Router.
Wallet snapshot
Wallet age
4.6 years
Transfers observed
222
Native balance
0.0033 ETH
Last activity
1.4 years ago
Counterparties
43
Primary risk drivers
High inbound value concentration
Single source supplied 80% of inbound ETH value · Distinct inbound counterparties (all assets): 13
A large share of inbound value is concentrated in a few transfers, which can indicate a single large unexplained windfall.
Source return flow detected
Source return count: 3 · Repeated amount-band recirculation: 2 · Funding dependency concentration: 89% · Multi-hop pressure: 16/100
Observed sources later reappear as return destinations, which reduces legibility and suggests recirculating flow rather than clean one-direction settlement.
Funding dependency concentration
Source return count: 3 · Repeated amount-band recirculation: 2 · Funding dependency concentration: 89% · Multi-hop pressure: 16/100
A large share of inbound activity appears to depend on one upstream source, which increases dependence risk and can be a precursor to distribution or circular funding patterns.
Sanctioned counterparty interactions
Lazarus Group (DPRK)
0x098b716b8aaf21512996dc57eb0615e2383e2f96 ↗OFAC_SDN · Axie Infinity Ronin Bridge hack proceeds
Observed entity context
Labels
Uniswap Universal RouterSushi Routersushiswapcircletether
Protocols
uniswapWrapped Ether (WETH)circleUniswap V2 Routertether
Offsetting factors
Established history
Wallet age: 4.6y (observed)
Observable activity present
Transfers observed: 222
Moderately distributed counterparties
Unique counterparties observed: 43
Analyst briefing
Executive Risk Verdict
This 4.6-year-old address presents moderate counterparty risk. The leading concerns are High inbound value concentration and Source return flow detected, which warrant manual review before this case is treated as routine.
Decision Posture
Review before proceeding. This case is not an automatic stop, but the current signal mix or confidence level is not strong enough to treat it as routine without human review.
Primary Risk Drivers
High inbound value concentration Single source supplied 80% of inbound ETH value Distinct inbound counterparties (all assets): 13 A large share of inbound value is concentrated in a few transfers, which can indicate a single large unexplained windfall.
Source return flow detected
Source return count: 3
Repeated amount-band recirculation: 2
Funding dependency concentration: 89%
Observed sources later reappear as return destinations, which reduces legibility and suggests recirculating flow rather than clean one-direction settlement.
Funding dependency concentration
Source return count: 3
Repeated amount-band recirculation: 2
Funding dependency concentration: 89%
A large share of inbound activity appears to depend on one upstream source, which increases dependence risk and can be a precursor to distribution or circular funding patterns.
Offsetting Factors
Established history Wallet age: 4.6y (observed)
Observable activity present
Transfers observed: 222
Moderately distributed counterparties
Unique counterparties observed: 43
Structural Pattern Observations
Fan-out distribution (medium confidence) The observed flow pattern is consistent with fan-out distribution behavior and also carries additional review pressure from thin visibility, limited history, or sensitive exposure. This is not a misconduct finding, but it is not a routine pattern under current coverage.
Behavior Distribution
Exchange-related interactions: 0% of observed activity. DEX-related interactions: 2% of observed activity. Bridge-related interactions: 12% of observed activity. Router / aggregator interactions: 1% of observed activity. Attributed interactions: 100% of observed activity, but only 2% resolved with high confidence, the remainder are unlabeled contract interactions, which is opacity rather than meaningful attribution coverage. High-confidence attributed interactions: 2% of observed activity.
Normalization Context
Observed bridge activity is being treated primarily as cross-chain operational context, not as a standalone adverse signal.
DEX and router usage further support a normal DeFi execution interpretation unless paired with sensitive exposure or suspicious concentration.
Observed Entity / Protocol Context
Uniswap Universal Router Sushi Router sushiswap circle tether
Observed Protocol Attribution
uniswap Wrapped Ether (WETH) circle Uniswap V2 Router tether
Confidence Statement
Overall assessment confidence is high (86%), reflecting stronger sample depth, better coverage, and more stable observable behavior.
Sensitivity notes
Fresh activity could change this classification because the current signal is not recent.
Off-chain context would be particularly valuable here, the detected structural patterns raise interpretive ambiguity that on-chain data alone cannot resolve.
For analysts
Generate a Defensible Verdict Report — engine version + timestamp baked in, exportable as PDF or copy-pasted as Markdown into a SAR narrative or case file.
Run your own wallet through CredScore
Deterministic Ethereum wallet risk scoring with a full audit trail. Every signal has an explicit numeric weight, output is reproducible. Paste any wallet to see your own verdict.
First analysis is free, no credit card. Or see pricing.
Shared Aug 23, 2026