CredScore verdict
0x8f05…e9ebethereumScore
0
0 = max risk · 100 = clean
High riskEscalateConfidence:58%
Escalate for deeper review
CredScore sees a 3.9-year-old wallet with 171 transfers. Sanctions-sensitive exposure context and High-confidence sanctions attribution are severe enough to require escalation before any further interaction.
Wallet snapshot
Wallet age
3.9 years
Transfers observed
171
Last activity
1.3 years ago
Counterparties
22
Primary risk drivers
Sanctions-sensitive exposure context
Sanctioned counterparty interactions observed: 1 · Observed labels: maker, DAI Token, 1inch V4 Router
Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
High-confidence sanctions attribution
Sanctioned counterparty interactions observed: 1
Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
DEX-routed pass-through pattern
Single inbound source supplied 98% of inbound value · DEX + aggregator routing share: 19% of activity · Flow directionality: heavily one-sided (balance score 0.00)
A dominant share of the wallet's inbound value came from a single source, was routed through DEX or aggregator swap activity, and was drained from the wallet rather than retained. This is the laundering fingerprint observed on documented social-engineering theft cases: a large victim transfer arrives, gets fragmented into many DEX swaps to convert and obscure the asset trail, and the wallet is emptied. It is also consistent with one-shot legitimate behavior (an ICO recipient or grant payee cashing out via DEX), so it warrants review until the funding-source provenance is established.
Sanctioned counterparty interactions
Observed entity context
Labels
makerDAI Token1inch V4 RouterDAI contractGnosis Omnibridge
Protocols
1inch V4 RouterGnosis OmnibridgeArbitrum Bridge RouterDAI contractmaker
Offsetting factors
Established history
Wallet age: 3.9y (observed)
Observable activity present
Transfers observed: 171
Moderately distributed counterparties
Unique counterparties observed: 22
Analyst briefing
Executive Risk Verdict
This address presents elevated counterparty risk. Sanctions-sensitive exposure context and High-confidence sanctions attribution compose adverse signal severe enough to justify escalation under current coverage.
Decision Posture
Escalate for deeper review. Multiple adverse signals co-occur at sufficient intensity (adverse pressure score: 64/100). The signal combination is materially more concerning than any individual flag and requires human context to resolve correctly.
Primary Risk Drivers
Sanctions-sensitive exposure context Sanctioned counterparty interactions observed: 1 Observed labels: maker, DAI Token, 1inch V4 Router Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
High-confidence sanctions attribution
Sanctioned counterparty interactions observed: 1
Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
DEX-routed pass-through pattern
Single inbound source supplied 98% of inbound value
DEX + aggregator routing share: 19% of activity
Flow directionality: heavily one-sided (balance score 0.00)
A dominant share of the wallet's inbound value came from a single source, was routed through DEX or aggregator swap activity, and was drained from the wallet rather than retained. This is the laundering fingerprint observed on documented social-engineering theft cases: a large victim transfer arrives, gets fragmented into many DEX swaps to convert and obscure the asset trail, and the wallet is emptied. It is also consistent with one-shot legitimate behavior (an ICO recipient or grant payee cashing out via DEX), so it warrants review until the funding-source provenance is established.
Offsetting Factors
Established history Wallet age: 3.9y (observed)
Observable activity present
Transfers observed: 171
Moderately distributed counterparties
Unique counterparties observed: 22
Structural Pattern Observations
Fan-out distribution (high confidence) The observed flow pattern is consistent with fan-out distribution behavior and also carries additional review pressure from thin visibility, limited history, or sensitive exposure. This is not a misconduct finding, but it is not a routine pattern under current coverage.
Behavior Distribution
Exchange-related interactions: 1% of observed activity. DEX-related interactions: 19% of observed activity. Bridge-related interactions: 2% of observed activity. Attributed interactions: 100% of observed activity, but only 1% resolved with high confidence, the remainder are unlabeled contract interactions, which is opacity rather than meaningful attribution coverage. High-confidence attributed interactions: 1% of observed activity.
Observed Entity / Protocol Context
maker DAI Token 1inch V4 Router DAI contract Gnosis Omnibridge
Observed Protocol Attribution
1inch V4 Router Gnosis Omnibridge Arbitrum Bridge Router DAI contract maker
Confidence Statement
Overall assessment confidence is moderate (58%), reflecting partial coverage with usable but still incomplete behavioral signal.
Sensitivity notes
Fresh activity could change this classification because the current signal is not recent.
Improved data coverage for missing core metrics would likely improve confidence and may affect the trust score.
Off-chain context would be particularly valuable here, the detected structural patterns raise interpretive ambiguity that on-chain data alone cannot resolve.
For analysts
Generate a Defensible Verdict Report — engine version + timestamp baked in, exportable as PDF or copy-pasted as Markdown into a SAR narrative or case file.
Run your own wallet through CredScore
Deterministic Ethereum wallet risk scoring with a full audit trail. Every signal has an explicit numeric weight, output is reproducible. Paste any wallet to see your own verdict.
First analysis is free, no credit card. Or see pricing.
Shared Jul 13, 2026