CredScore verdict
0x1151…e30feth-mainnetScore
47
0 = max risk · 100 = clean
Medium riskReviewConfidence:72%
Review before proceeding
CredScore sees a 9.9-year-old wallet holding 10.0 ETH with at least 501 transfers. History capped by fetch limit and High inbound value concentration warrant manual review before this case is treated as routine.
Wallet snapshot
Wallet age
9.9 years
Transfers observed
501
Native balance
9.98 ETH
Last activity
2 months ago
Counterparties
130
Primary risk drivers
History capped by fetch limit
Transfers observed: At least 501 · History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 500)
Incomplete transfer coverage reduces confidence because observed totals may be lower bounds.
High inbound value concentration
Single source supplied >99% of inbound ETH value · Distinct inbound counterparties (all assets): 117
A large share of inbound value is concentrated in a few transfers, which can indicate a single large unexplained windfall.
Repeated amount-band recirculation
Source return count: 1 · Repeated amount-band recirculation: 18 · Funding dependency concentration: 60% · Multi-hop pressure: 16/100
Repeated reuse of the same transfer size bands across a narrow routing set can indicate mechanical flow or recirculation rather than broad organic usage.
Observed entity context
Protocols
Null / Burn AddressEthereum FoundationWrapped Ether (WETH)
Offsetting factors
Established history
Wallet age: 9.9y (observed)
Recognizable protocol attribution
Observed protocol: Null / Burn Address · Observed protocol: Ethereum Foundation · Observed protocol: Wrapped Ether (WETH)
Analyst briefing
Executive Risk Verdict
This 9.9-year-old address presents moderate counterparty risk. The leading concerns are History capped by fetch limit and High inbound value concentration, which warrant manual review before this case is treated as routine.
Decision Posture
Review before proceeding. Multiple review-sensitive structural patterns were detected. The combination increases interpretive complexity beyond what automated assessment can resolve without human context.
Primary Risk Drivers
History capped by fetch limit Transfers observed: At least 501 History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 500) Incomplete transfer coverage reduces confidence because observed totals may be lower bounds.
High inbound value concentration
Single source supplied >99% of inbound ETH value
Distinct inbound counterparties (all assets): 117
A large share of inbound value is concentrated in a few transfers, which can indicate a single large unexplained windfall.
Repeated amount-band recirculation
Source return count: 1
Repeated amount-band recirculation: 18
Funding dependency concentration: 60%
Repeated reuse of the same transfer size bands across a narrow routing set can indicate mechanical flow or recirculation rather than broad organic usage.
Offsetting Factors
Established history Wallet age: 9.9y (observed)
Recognizable protocol attribution
Observed protocol: Null / Burn Address
Observed protocol: Ethereum Foundation
Observed protocol: Wrapped Ether (WETH)
Structural Pattern Observations
Fan-out distribution (medium confidence) The observed flow pattern is consistent with fan-out distribution behavior and also carries additional review pressure from thin visibility, limited history, or sensitive exposure. This is not a misconduct finding, but it is not a routine pattern under current coverage.
Hub-and-spoke structure (medium confidence)
The observed flow structure is consistent with a hub-and-spoke arrangement, where a central routing posture coexists with a broad but uneven counterparty set. This is common in treasury, market-making, and organized distribution contexts. It increases structural complexity but is not inherently adverse.
Behavior Distribution
Exchange-related interactions: 0% of observed activity. Attributed interactions: 100% of observed activity, but only 0% resolved with high confidence, the remainder are unlabeled contract interactions, which is opacity rather than meaningful attribution coverage. High-confidence attributed interactions: 0% of observed activity.
Observed Protocol Attribution
Null / Burn Address Ethereum Foundation Wrapped Ether (WETH)
Confidence Statement
Overall assessment confidence is high (72%), reflecting stronger sample depth, better coverage, and more stable observable behavior.
Sensitivity notes
Improved transaction coverage could materially change activity-based interpretation and increase confidence.
Off-chain context would be particularly valuable here, the detected structural patterns raise interpretive ambiguity that on-chain data alone cannot resolve.
The dormancy-reactivation pattern warrants direct inquiry, understanding what triggered resumed activity would substantially clarify the current behavioral picture.
For analysts
Generate a Defensible Verdict Report — engine version + timestamp baked in, exportable as PDF or copy-pasted as Markdown into a SAR narrative or case file.
Run your own wallet through CredScore
Deterministic Ethereum wallet risk scoring with a full audit trail. Every signal has an explicit numeric weight, output is reproducible. Paste any wallet to see your own verdict.
First analysis is free, no credit card. Or see pricing.
Shared Jul 6, 2026