CredScore verdict
0x8d79…7607eth-mainnetScore
12
0 = max risk · 100 = clean
High riskEscalateConfidence:94%
Escalate for deeper review
CredScore sees a 7.2-year-old wallet with 334 transfers. High-confidence sanctions attribution and Repeated amount-band recirculation are severe enough to require escalation before any further interaction.
Wallet snapshot
Wallet age
7.2 years
Transfers observed
334
Native balance
0.0234 ETH
Last activity
19 days ago
Counterparties
76
Primary risk drivers
High-confidence sanctions attribution
This wallet itself is on a sanctions watchlist (per the curated registry or OFAC SDN sync).
Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
Repeated amount-band recirculation
Source return count: 1 · Repeated amount-band recirculation: 18 · Funding dependency concentration: 10%
Repeated reuse of the same transfer size bands across a narrow routing set can indicate mechanical flow or recirculation rather than broad organic usage.
Rapid inflow pattern
Rapid inbound events observed: 16
Rapid inflow behavior can indicate burst accumulation or intermediary routing patterns that deserve review.
Sanctioned counterparty interactions
Observed entity context
Labels
USDT Tokentransfertether
Protocols
tetherUSDT contract
Offsetting factors
Established history
Wallet age: 7.2y (observed)
Observable activity present
Transfers observed: 334
Moderately distributed counterparties
Unique counterparties observed: 76
Analyst briefing
Executive Risk Verdict
This address presents elevated counterparty risk. High-confidence sanctions attribution and Repeated amount-band recirculation compose adverse signal severe enough to justify escalation under current coverage.
Decision Posture
Escalate for deeper review. A specific high-risk signal combination was detected (sanctions self). This pattern is materially more concerning than any individual flag in isolation and requires human context to resolve correctly.
Primary Risk Drivers
High-confidence sanctions attribution This wallet itself is on a sanctions watchlist (per the curated registry or OFAC SDN sync). Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
Repeated amount-band recirculation
Source return count: 1
Repeated amount-band recirculation: 18
Funding dependency concentration: 10%
Repeated reuse of the same transfer size bands across a narrow routing set can indicate mechanical flow or recirculation rather than broad organic usage.
Rapid inflow pattern
Rapid inbound events observed: 16
Rapid inflow behavior can indicate burst accumulation or intermediary routing patterns that deserve review.
Offsetting Factors
Established history Wallet age: 7.2y (observed)
Observable activity present
Transfers observed: 334
Moderately distributed counterparties
Unique counterparties observed: 76
Behavior Distribution
Exchange-related interactions: 0% of observed activity. Attributed interactions: 100% of observed activity. High-confidence attributed interactions: 36% of observed activity.
Observed Entity / Protocol Context
USDT Token transfer tether
Observed Protocol Attribution
tether USDT contract
Confidence Statement
Overall assessment confidence is high (94%), reflecting stronger sample depth, better coverage, and more stable observable behavior.
Sensitivity notes
No immediate sensitivity drivers were identified from generalized metrics. Larger changes would likely come from stronger exposure and attribution intelligence.
For analysts
Generate a Defensible Verdict Report — engine version + timestamp baked in, exportable as PDF or copy-pasted as Markdown into a SAR narrative or case file.
Run your own wallet through CredScore
Deterministic Ethereum wallet risk scoring with a full audit trail. Every signal has an explicit numeric weight, output is reproducible. Paste any wallet to see your own verdict.
First analysis is free, no credit card. Or see pricing.
Shared Aug 27, 2026