CredScore verdict
0x374d…a639ethereum
Score
21
0 = max risk · 100 = clean
High riskEscalateConfidence:44%
Escalate for deeper review
CredScore sees a 8.3-year-old wallet with 25 transfers. Sanctions-sensitive exposure context and Balance unavailable are severe enough to require escalation before any further interaction.
Wallet snapshot
Wallet age
8.3 years
Transfers observed
25
Last activity
1.3 years ago
Counterparties
19
Primary risk drivers
Sanctions-sensitive exposure context
Sanctioned counterparty interactions observed: 1
Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
Balance unavailable
Native balance: Unknown
Missing core metrics reduce confidence and increase the chance of misclassification.
High contract interaction density
Unique contracts observed: 17 · Contract interaction density: 0.68
Heavy interaction with many contracts raises complexity and can increase behavioral uncertainty, although this may be normal for protocol-native wallets.
Sanctioned counterparty interactions
OFAC SDN-listed address
0x7db418b5d567a4e0e8c59ad71be1fce48f3e6107 ↗
OFAC_SDN · OFAC SDN ETH list (maintained mirror); not present in truncated CSV
Offsetting factors
Established history
Wallet age: 8.3y (observed)
Observable activity present
Transfers observed: 25
Moderately distributed counterparties
Unique counterparties observed: 19
Analyst briefing
Executive Risk Verdict
This address presents elevated counterparty risk. Sanctions-sensitive exposure context and Balance unavailable compose adverse signal severe enough to justify escalation under current coverage.
Decision Posture
Escalate for deeper review. A specific high-risk signal combination was detected (sanctions exposure). This pattern is materially more concerning than any individual flag in isolation and requires human context to resolve correctly.
Primary Risk Drivers
Sanctions-sensitive exposure context Sanctioned counterparty interactions observed: 1 Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
Balance unavailable
Native balance: Unknown
Missing core metrics reduce confidence and increase the chance of misclassification.
High contract interaction density
Unique contracts observed: 17
Contract interaction density: 0.68
Heavy interaction with many contracts raises complexity and can increase behavioral uncertainty, although this may be normal for protocol-native wallets.
Offsetting Factors
Established history Wallet age: 8.3y (observed)
Observable activity present
Transfers observed: 25
Moderately distributed counterparties
Unique counterparties observed: 19
Behavior Distribution
Exchange-related interactions: 20% of observed activity. Attributed interactions: 100% of observed activity, but only 0% resolved with high confidence, the remainder are unlabeled contract interactions, which is opacity rather than meaningful attribution coverage. High-confidence attributed interactions: 0% of observed activity.
Confidence Statement
Overall assessment confidence is low (44%), constrained by limited coverage, short history, or sparse behavioral signal.
Sensitivity notes
Fresh activity could change this classification because the current signal is not recent.
Improved data coverage for missing core metrics would likely improve confidence and may affect the trust score.
For analysts
Generate a Defensible Verdict Report — engine version + timestamp baked in, exportable as PDF or copy-pasted as Markdown into a SAR narrative or case file.
Open report →
Run your own wallet through CredScore

Deterministic Ethereum wallet risk scoring with a full audit trail. Every signal has an explicit numeric weight, output is reproducible. Paste any wallet to see your own verdict.

First analysis is free, no credit card. Or see pricing.
Shared Jul 11, 2026