CredScore verdict
0x2f38…6535ethereumScore
12
0 = max risk · 100 = clean
High riskEscalateConfidence:58%
Escalate for deeper review
CredScore sees a 8.1-year-old wallet with at least 501 transfers. High-confidence sanctions attribution and Sanctions-sensitive exposure context are severe enough to require escalation before any further interaction.
Wallet snapshot
Wallet age
8.1 years
Transfers observed
501
Last activity
1.2 years ago
Counterparties
118
Primary risk drivers
High-confidence sanctions attribution
This wallet itself is on a sanctions watchlist (per the curated registry or OFAC SDN sync).
Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
Sanctions-sensitive exposure context
Sanctioned counterparty interactions observed: 1 · Observed labels: USDT Token, USDC Token, circle
Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
History capped by fetch limit
Transfers observed: At least 501 · History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 500)
Incomplete transfer coverage reduces confidence because observed totals may be lower bounds.
Sanctioned counterparty interactions
OFAC SDN-listed address
0x2f389ce8bd8ff92de3402ffce4691d17fc4f6535 ↗OFAC_SDN · OFAC SDN ETH list (maintained mirror); not present in truncated CSV
OFAC SDN-listed address
0x67d40ee1a85bf4a4bb7ffae16de985e8427b6b45 ↗OFAC_SDN · OFAC SDN ETH list (maintained mirror); not present in truncated CSV
Observed entity context
Labels
USDT TokenUSDC Tokencircletether
Protocols
tetherUSDT contractcircle
Offsetting factors
Established history
Wallet age: 8.1y (observed)
Material attribution coverage
Attributed interaction share: 100% (26% high-confidence)
High-confidence label coverage
High-confidence attributed share: 26%
Analyst briefing
Executive Risk Verdict
This address presents elevated counterparty risk. High-confidence sanctions attribution and Sanctions-sensitive exposure context compose adverse signal severe enough to justify escalation under current coverage.
Decision Posture
Escalate for deeper review. A specific high-risk signal combination was detected (sanctions self). This pattern is materially more concerning than any individual flag in isolation and requires human context to resolve correctly.
Primary Risk Drivers
High-confidence sanctions attribution This wallet itself is on a sanctions watchlist (per the curated registry or OFAC SDN sync). Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
Sanctions-sensitive exposure context
Sanctioned counterparty interactions observed: 1
Observed labels: USDT Token, USDC Token, circle
Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
History capped by fetch limit
Transfers observed: At least 501
History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 500)
Incomplete transfer coverage reduces confidence because observed totals may be lower bounds.
Offsetting Factors
Established history Wallet age: 8.1y (observed)
Material attribution coverage
Attributed interaction share: 100% (26% high-confidence)
High-confidence label coverage
High-confidence attributed share: 26%
Behavior Distribution
Exchange-related interactions: 2% of observed activity. Attributed interactions: 100% of observed activity. High-confidence attributed interactions: 26% of observed activity.
Observed Entity / Protocol Context
USDT Token USDC Token circle tether
Observed Protocol Attribution
tether USDT contract circle
Confidence Statement
Overall assessment confidence is moderate (58%), reflecting partial coverage with usable but still incomplete behavioral signal.
Sensitivity notes
Improved transaction coverage could materially change activity-based interpretation and increase confidence.
Fresh activity could change this classification because the current signal is not recent.
Improved data coverage for missing core metrics would likely improve confidence and may affect the trust score.
For analysts
Generate a Defensible Verdict Report — engine version + timestamp baked in, exportable as PDF or copy-pasted as Markdown into a SAR narrative or case file.
Run your own wallet through CredScore
Deterministic Ethereum wallet risk scoring with a full audit trail. Every signal has an explicit numeric weight, output is reproducible. Paste any wallet to see your own verdict.
First analysis is free, no credit card. Or see pricing.
Shared Jul 11, 2026