CredScore verdict
0xc76b…11b3ethereumScore
12
0 = max risk · 100 = clean
High riskEscalateConfidence:44%
Escalate for deeper review
CredScore sees a 10-month-old wallet with 15 transfers. Sanctions-sensitive exposure context and High-confidence sanctions attribution are severe enough to require escalation before any further interaction.
Wallet snapshot
Wallet age
10 months
Transfers observed
15
Last activity
9 months ago
Counterparties
6
Primary risk drivers
Sanctions-sensitive exposure context
Sanctioned counterparty interactions observed: 1 · Observed labels: USDT Token, tether, USDT contract
Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
High-confidence sanctions attribution
Sanctioned counterparty interactions observed: 1
Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
Balance unavailable
Native balance: Unknown
Missing core metrics reduce confidence and increase the chance of misclassification.
Sanctioned counterparty interactions
Observed entity context
Labels
USDT TokentetherUSDT contract
Protocols
tetherUSDT contract
Offsetting factors
Observable activity present
Transfers observed: 15
Moderately distributed counterparties
Unique counterparties observed: 6
Material attribution coverage
Attributed interaction share: 100% (33% high-confidence)
Analyst briefing
Executive Risk Verdict
This address presents elevated counterparty risk. Sanctions-sensitive exposure context and High-confidence sanctions attribution compose adverse signal severe enough to justify escalation under current coverage.
Decision Posture
Escalate for deeper review. A specific high-risk signal combination was detected (sanctions self). This pattern is materially more concerning than any individual flag in isolation and requires human context to resolve correctly.
Primary Risk Drivers
Sanctions-sensitive exposure context Sanctioned counterparty interactions observed: 1 Observed labels: USDT Token, tether, USDT contract Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
High-confidence sanctions attribution
Sanctioned counterparty interactions observed: 1
Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
Balance unavailable
Native balance: Unknown
Missing core metrics reduce confidence and increase the chance of misclassification.
Offsetting Factors
Observable activity present Transfers observed: 15
Moderately distributed counterparties
Unique counterparties observed: 6
Material attribution coverage
Attributed interaction share: 100% (33% high-confidence)
Behavior Distribution
Attributed interactions: 100% of observed activity. High-confidence attributed interactions: 33% of observed activity.
Observed Entity / Protocol Context
USDT Token tether USDT contract
Observed Protocol Attribution
tether USDT contract
Confidence Statement
Overall assessment confidence is low (44%), constrained by limited coverage, short history, or sparse behavioral signal.
Sensitivity notes
Fresh activity could change this classification because the current signal is not recent.
Improved data coverage for missing core metrics would likely improve confidence and may affect the trust score.
For analysts
Generate a Defensible Verdict Report — engine version + timestamp baked in, exportable as PDF or copy-pasted as Markdown into a SAR narrative or case file.
Run your own wallet through CredScore
Deterministic Ethereum wallet risk scoring with a full audit trail. Every signal has an explicit numeric weight, output is reproducible. Paste any wallet to see your own verdict.
First analysis is free, no credit card. Or see pricing.
Shared Jul 13, 2026