CredScore verdict
Compared to last analysis
Jul 5, 2026 →Score
-38
riskier
Tier
Unknown → High
Posture
— → Escalate
New drivers: High-confidence sanctions attribution, Balance unavailable, self_sanctioned_address
0xe950…58ffethereumScore
12
0 = max risk · 100 = clean
High riskEscalateConfidence:52%
Escalate for deeper review
CredScore sees a 4.9-year-old wallet with 17 transfers. High-confidence sanctions attribution and Balance unavailable are severe enough to require escalation before any further interaction.
Wallet snapshot
Wallet age
4.9 years
Transfers observed
17
Last activity
2 months ago
Counterparties
14
Primary risk drivers
High-confidence sanctions attribution
This wallet itself is on a sanctions watchlist (per the curated registry or OFAC SDN sync).
Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
Balance unavailable
Native balance: Unknown
Missing core metrics reduce confidence and increase the chance of misclassification.
self_sanctioned_address
This wallet itself appears on the OFAC SDN list or the curated sanctions registry.
This signal materially affects trust assessment under generalized on-chain metrics.
Sanctioned counterparty interactions
Observed entity context
Labels
transferUSDT Tokentether
Protocols
tether
Offsetting factors
Established history
Wallet age: 4.9y (observed)
Observable activity present
Transfers observed: 17
Moderately distributed counterparties
Unique counterparties observed: 14
Analyst briefing
Executive Risk Verdict
This address presents elevated counterparty risk. High-confidence sanctions attribution and Balance unavailable compose adverse signal severe enough to justify escalation under current coverage.
Decision Posture
Escalate for deeper review. A specific high-risk signal combination was detected (sanctions self). This pattern is materially more concerning than any individual flag in isolation and requires human context to resolve correctly.
Primary Risk Drivers
High-confidence sanctions attribution This wallet itself is on a sanctions watchlist (per the curated registry or OFAC SDN sync). Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
Balance unavailable
Native balance: Unknown
Missing core metrics reduce confidence and increase the chance of misclassification.
self_sanctioned_address
This wallet itself appears on the OFAC SDN list or the curated sanctions registry.
This signal materially affects trust assessment under generalized on-chain metrics.
Offsetting Factors
Established history Wallet age: 4.9y (observed)
Observable activity present
Transfers observed: 17
Moderately distributed counterparties
Unique counterparties observed: 14
Behavior Distribution
Exchange-related interactions: 47% of observed activity. Attributed interactions: 100% of observed activity. High-confidence attributed interactions: 18% of observed activity.
Observed Entity / Protocol Context
transfer USDT Token tether
Observed Protocol Attribution
tether
Confidence Statement
Overall assessment confidence is moderate (52%), reflecting partial coverage with usable but still incomplete behavioral signal.
Sensitivity notes
Improved data coverage for missing core metrics would likely improve confidence and may affect the trust score.
For analysts
Generate a Defensible Verdict Report — engine version + timestamp baked in, exportable as PDF or copy-pasted as Markdown into a SAR narrative or case file.
Run your own wallet through CredScore
Deterministic Ethereum wallet risk scoring with a full audit trail. Every signal has an explicit numeric weight, output is reproducible. Paste any wallet to see your own verdict.
First analysis is free, no credit card. Or see pricing.
Shared Jul 11, 2026