CredScore verdict
0x698e…da27ethereumScore
42
0 = max risk · 100 = clean
Medium riskReviewConfidence:36%
Review before proceeding
CredScore sees a 8-day-old wallet with at least 112 transfers. High activity with limited history and History capped by fetch limit warrant manual review before this case is treated as routine. Observed entity context: Metamask Swaps, USDT Token.
Wallet snapshot
Wallet age
7 days
Transfers observed
112
Last activity
4 days ago
Counterparties
35
Primary risk drivers
High activity with limited history
Transfers observed: At least 112 · History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 500)
High activity in a newly observed wallet can indicate burst behavior that deserves closer review, especially when there is not yet enough time depth to normalize the pattern.
History capped by fetch limit
Transfers observed: At least 112 · History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 500)
Incomplete transfer coverage reduces confidence because observed totals may be lower bounds.
Repeated amount-band recirculation
Circular loop count: 1 · Source return count: 1 · Repeated amount-band recirculation: 2 · Funding dependency concentration: 43%
Repeated reuse of the same transfer size bands across a narrow routing set can indicate mechanical flow or recirculation rather than broad organic usage.
Observed entity context
Labels
Metamask SwapsUSDT Token1inchmetamasktether
Protocols
Wrapped Ether (WETH)Uniswap V2 Routermetamasktether1inch
Offsetting factors
Moderately distributed counterparties
Unique counterparties observed: 35
Recognizable exchange or protocol context
Observed label: Metamask Swaps · Observed label: USDT Token · Observed label: 1inch
Recognizable protocol attribution
Observed protocol: Wrapped Ether (WETH) · Observed protocol: Uniswap V2 Router · Observed protocol: metamask
Analyst briefing
Executive Risk Verdict
This 8-day-old address presents moderate counterparty risk. The leading concerns are High activity with limited history and History capped by fetch limit, which warrant manual review before this case is treated as routine.
Decision Posture
Review before proceeding. This case is not an automatic stop, but the current signal mix or confidence level is not strong enough to treat it as routine without human review.
Primary Risk Drivers
High activity with limited history Transfers observed: At least 112 History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 500) High activity in a newly observed wallet can indicate burst behavior that deserves closer review, especially when there is not yet enough time depth to normalize the pattern.
History capped by fetch limit
Transfers observed: At least 112
History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 500)
Incomplete transfer coverage reduces confidence because observed totals may be lower bounds.
Repeated amount-band recirculation
Circular loop count: 1
Source return count: 1
Repeated amount-band recirculation: 2
Repeated reuse of the same transfer size bands across a narrow routing set can indicate mechanical flow or recirculation rather than broad organic usage.
Offsetting Factors
Moderately distributed counterparties Unique counterparties observed: 35
Recognizable exchange or protocol context
Observed label: Metamask Swaps
Observed label: USDT Token
Observed label: 1inch
Recognizable protocol attribution
Observed protocol: Wrapped Ether (WETH)
Observed protocol: Uniswap V2 Router
Observed protocol: metamask
Behavior Distribution
DEX-related interactions: 13% of observed activity. Router / aggregator interactions: 4% of observed activity. Attributed interactions: 100% of observed activity, but only 4% resolved with high confidence, the remainder are unlabeled contract interactions, which is opacity rather than meaningful attribution coverage. High-confidence attributed interactions: 4% of observed activity.
Observed Entity / Protocol Context
Metamask Swaps USDT Token 1inch metamask tether
Observed Protocol Attribution
Wrapped Ether (WETH) Uniswap V2 Router metamask tether 1inch
Confidence Statement
Overall assessment confidence is low (36%), constrained by limited coverage, short history, or sparse behavioral signal.
Sensitivity notes
Improved transaction coverage could materially change activity-based interpretation and increase confidence.
As more history accumulates, this address may stabilize into a clearer behavioral profile.
Improved data coverage for missing core metrics would likely improve confidence and may affect the trust score.
For analysts
Generate a Defensible Verdict Report — engine version + timestamp baked in, exportable as PDF or copy-pasted as Markdown into a SAR narrative or case file.
Run your own wallet through CredScore
Deterministic Ethereum wallet risk scoring with a full audit trail. Every signal has an explicit numeric weight, output is reproducible. Paste any wallet to see your own verdict.
First analysis is free, no credit card. Or see pricing.
Shared Oct 11, 2026