CredScore verdict
0x5e7c…f5cdeth-mainnetScore
16
0 = max risk · 100 = clean
High riskEscalateConfidence:58%
Escalate for deeper review
CredScore sees a 4.3-year-old wallet with at least 180 transfers. Sanctions-sensitive exposure context and Review-sensitive peel-chain-like routing are severe enough to require escalation before any further interaction.
Wallet snapshot
Wallet age
4.3 years
Transfers observed
180
Native balance
0.0001 ETH
Last activity
3.8 years ago
Counterparties
4
Primary risk drivers
Sanctions-sensitive exposure context
Sanctioned counterparty interactions observed: 1
Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
Review-sensitive peel-chain-like routing
Transfers observed: At least 180 · Unique counterparties: 4 · Top counterparty share: 98%
A review-sensitive peel-chain-like routing pattern was detected. The observed combination of self-transfers, narrow counterparties, and repetitive flow is consistent with layered routing behavior that warrants closer inspection.
History capped by fetch limit
Transfers observed: At least 180 · History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 500)
Incomplete transfer coverage reduces confidence because observed totals may be lower bounds.
Sanctioned counterparty interactions
Lazarus Group (DPRK)
0x098b716b8aaf21512996dc57eb0615e2383e2f96 ↗OFAC_SDN · Axie Infinity Ronin Bridge hack proceeds
Offsetting factors
Established history
Wallet age: 4.3y (observed)
Bridge usage provides cross-chain context
Bridge-related interaction share: 91%
Analyst briefing
Executive Risk Verdict
This address presents elevated counterparty risk. Sanctions-sensitive exposure context and Review-sensitive peel-chain-like routing compose adverse signal severe enough to justify escalation under current coverage.
Decision Posture
Escalate for deeper review. A specific high-risk signal combination was detected (sanctions exposure). This pattern is materially more concerning than any individual flag in isolation and requires human context to resolve correctly.
Primary Risk Drivers
Sanctions-sensitive exposure context Sanctioned counterparty interactions observed: 1 Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
Review-sensitive peel-chain-like routing
Transfers observed: At least 180
Unique counterparties: 4
Top counterparty share: 98%
A review-sensitive peel-chain-like routing pattern was detected. The observed combination of self-transfers, narrow counterparties, and repetitive flow is consistent with layered routing behavior that warrants closer inspection.
History capped by fetch limit
Transfers observed: At least 180
History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 500)
Incomplete transfer coverage reduces confidence because observed totals may be lower bounds.
Offsetting Factors
Established history Wallet age: 4.3y (observed)
Bridge usage provides cross-chain context
Bridge-related interaction share: 91%
Structural Pattern Observations
Peel-chain-like routing (medium confidence) The observed routing pattern is consistent with peel-chain-like behavior and also carries additional review pressure from sensitive context, weak attribution, or limited wallet maturity. This is a structurally important pattern under current coverage.
Behavior Distribution
Bridge-related interactions: 91% of observed activity. Attributed interactions: 100% of observed activity, but only 0% resolved with high confidence, the remainder are unlabeled contract interactions, which is opacity rather than meaningful attribution coverage. High-confidence attributed interactions: 0% of observed activity.
Confidence Statement
Overall assessment confidence is moderate (58%), reflecting partial coverage with usable but still incomplete behavioral signal.
Sensitivity notes
Improved transaction coverage could materially change activity-based interpretation and increase confidence.
Fresh activity could change this classification because the current signal is not recent.
Off-chain context would be particularly valuable here, the detected structural patterns raise interpretive ambiguity that on-chain data alone cannot resolve.
For analysts
Generate a Defensible Verdict Report — engine version + timestamp baked in, exportable as PDF or copy-pasted as Markdown into a SAR narrative or case file.
Run your own wallet through CredScore
Deterministic Ethereum wallet risk scoring with a full audit trail. Every signal has an explicit numeric weight, output is reproducible. Paste any wallet to see your own verdict.
First analysis is free, no credit card. Or see pricing.
Shared Jul 11, 2026