CredScore verdict
0x1b18…f477ethereumScore
46
0 = max risk · 100 = clean
Medium riskReviewConfidence:50%
Review before proceeding
CredScore sees a 3.6-year-old wallet with at least 501 transfers. DEX-routed pass-through pattern and History capped by fetch limit warrant manual review before this case is treated as routine. Observed entity context: USDT Token, tether.
Wallet snapshot
Wallet age
3.6 years
Transfers observed
501
Last activity
1 months ago
Counterparties
24
Primary risk drivers
DEX-routed pass-through pattern
Single inbound source supplied 63% of inbound value · Flow directionality: heavily one-sided (balance score 0.00)
A dominant share of the wallet's inbound value came from a single source, was routed through DEX or aggregator swap activity, and was drained from the wallet rather than retained. This is the laundering fingerprint observed on documented social-engineering theft cases: a large victim transfer arrives, gets fragmented into many DEX swaps to convert and obscure the asset trail, and the wallet is emptied. It is also consistent with one-shot legitimate behavior (an ICO recipient or grant payee cashing out via DEX), so it warrants review until the funding-source provenance is established.
History capped by fetch limit
Transfers observed: At least 501 · History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 500)
Incomplete transfer coverage reduces confidence because observed totals may be lower bounds.
Review-sensitive hub-and-spoke structure
Transfers observed: At least 501 · Unique counterparties: 24 · Top counterparty share: 89%
A review-sensitive hub-and-spoke structure was detected. The combination of broad counterparty set with high concentration and asymmetric flow pressure warrants closer structural review.
Observed entity context
Labels
USDT Tokentether
Protocols
Null / Burn AddresstetherWrapped Ether (WETH)
Offsetting factors
Established history
Wallet age: 3.6y (observed)
Moderately distributed counterparties
Unique counterparties observed: 24
Recognizable exchange or protocol context
Observed label: USDT Token · Observed label: tether
Analyst briefing
Executive Risk Verdict
This 3.6-year-old address presents moderate counterparty risk. The leading concerns are DEX-routed pass-through pattern and History capped by fetch limit, which warrant manual review before this case is treated as routine.
Decision Posture
Review before proceeding. This case is not an automatic stop, but the current signal mix or confidence level is not strong enough to treat it as routine without human review.
Primary Risk Drivers
DEX-routed pass-through pattern Single inbound source supplied 63% of inbound value Flow directionality: heavily one-sided (balance score 0.00) A dominant share of the wallet's inbound value came from a single source, was routed through DEX or aggregator swap activity, and was drained from the wallet rather than retained. This is the laundering fingerprint observed on documented social-engineering theft cases: a large victim transfer arrives, gets fragmented into many DEX swaps to convert and obscure the asset trail, and the wallet is emptied. It is also consistent with one-shot legitimate behavior (an ICO recipient or grant payee cashing out via DEX), so it warrants review until the funding-source provenance is established.
History capped by fetch limit
Transfers observed: At least 501
History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 500)
Incomplete transfer coverage reduces confidence because observed totals may be lower bounds.
Review-sensitive hub-and-spoke structure
Transfers observed: At least 501
Unique counterparties: 24
Top counterparty share: 89%
A review-sensitive hub-and-spoke structure was detected. The combination of broad counterparty set with high concentration and asymmetric flow pressure warrants closer structural review.
Offsetting Factors
Established history Wallet age: 3.6y (observed)
Moderately distributed counterparties
Unique counterparties observed: 24
Recognizable exchange or protocol context
Observed label: USDT Token
Observed label: tether
Structural Pattern Observations
Hub-and-spoke structure (medium confidence) The observed flow structure is consistent with a hub-and-spoke arrangement, where a central routing posture coexists with a broad but uneven counterparty set. This is common in treasury, market-making, and organized distribution contexts. It increases structural complexity but is not inherently adverse.
Behavior Distribution
Attributed interactions: 100% of observed activity, but only 0% resolved with high confidence, the remainder are unlabeled contract interactions, which is opacity rather than meaningful attribution coverage. High-confidence attributed interactions: 0% of observed activity.
Observed Entity / Protocol Context
USDT Token tether
Observed Protocol Attribution
Null / Burn Address tether Wrapped Ether (WETH)
Confidence Statement
Overall assessment confidence is moderate (50%), reflecting partial coverage with usable but still incomplete behavioral signal.
Sensitivity notes
Improved transaction coverage could materially change activity-based interpretation and increase confidence.
Improved data coverage for missing core metrics would likely improve confidence and may affect the trust score.
Off-chain context would be particularly valuable here, the detected structural patterns raise interpretive ambiguity that on-chain data alone cannot resolve.
For analysts
Generate a Defensible Verdict Report — engine version + timestamp baked in, exportable as PDF or copy-pasted as Markdown into a SAR narrative or case file.
Run your own wallet through CredScore
Deterministic Ethereum wallet risk scoring with a full audit trail. Every signal has an explicit numeric weight, output is reproducible. Paste any wallet to see your own verdict.
First analysis is free, no credit card. Or see pricing.
Shared Jul 12, 2026