CredScore verdict
0x1ec4…02e7eth-mainnetScore
62
0 = max risk · 100 = clean
Medium riskReviewConfidence:76%
Review before proceeding
CredScore sees a 4.6-year-old wallet with at least 501 transfers. History capped by fetch limit and Review-sensitive fan-out distribution pattern warrant manual review before this case is treated as routine. Observed entity context: WETH Token, wrapped-eth.
Wallet snapshot
Wallet age
4.6 years
Transfers observed
501
Native balance
0.0018 ETH
Last activity
2.2 years ago
Counterparties
40
Primary risk drivers
History capped by fetch limit
Transfers observed: At least 501 · History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 500)
Incomplete transfer coverage reduces confidence because observed totals may be lower bounds.
Review-sensitive fan-out distribution pattern
Transfers observed: At least 501 · Unique counterparties: 40 · Top counterparty share: 6%
A review-sensitive fan-out distribution pattern was detected. The structural heuristics indicate this wallet distributes funds to multiple distinct recipients in a compressed fashion that raises review priority when combined with other signals.
Rapid outflow pattern
Rapid outbound events observed: 453
Rapid outflow behavior can indicate routing, distribution, or non-routine operational flow that deserves review.
Observed entity context
Labels
WETH Tokenwrapped-ethammamm interaction
Protocols
wrapped-ethWrapped Ether (WETH)amm
Offsetting factors
Established history
Wallet age: 4.6y (observed)
Moderately distributed counterparties
Unique counterparties observed: 40
Recognizable exchange or protocol context
Observed label: WETH Token · Observed label: wrapped-eth · Observed label: amm
Analyst briefing
Executive Risk Verdict
This 4.6-year-old address presents moderate counterparty risk. The leading concerns are History capped by fetch limit and Review-sensitive fan-out distribution pattern, which warrant manual review before this case is treated as routine.
Decision Posture
Review before proceeding. This case is not an automatic stop, but the current signal mix or confidence level is not strong enough to treat it as routine without human review.
Primary Risk Drivers
History capped by fetch limit Transfers observed: At least 501 History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 500) Incomplete transfer coverage reduces confidence because observed totals may be lower bounds.
Review-sensitive fan-out distribution pattern
Transfers observed: At least 501
Unique counterparties: 40
Top counterparty share: 6%
A review-sensitive fan-out distribution pattern was detected. The structural heuristics indicate this wallet distributes funds to multiple distinct recipients in a compressed fashion that raises review priority when combined with other signals.
Rapid outflow pattern
Rapid outbound events observed: 453
Rapid outflow behavior can indicate routing, distribution, or non-routine operational flow that deserves review.
Offsetting Factors
Established history Wallet age: 4.6y (observed)
Moderately distributed counterparties
Unique counterparties observed: 40
Recognizable exchange or protocol context
Observed label: WETH Token
Observed label: wrapped-eth
Observed label: amm
Structural Pattern Observations
Fan-out distribution (high confidence) The observed flow pattern is consistent with fan-out distribution behavior and also carries additional review pressure from thin visibility, limited history, or sensitive exposure. This is not a misconduct finding, but it is not a routine pattern under current coverage.
Behavior Distribution
DEX-related interactions: 0% of observed activity. Attributed interactions: 100% of observed activity, but only 6% resolved with high confidence, the remainder are unlabeled contract interactions, which is opacity rather than meaningful attribution coverage. High-confidence attributed interactions: 6% of observed activity.
Observed Entity / Protocol Context
WETH Token wrapped-eth amm amm interaction
Observed Protocol Attribution
wrapped-eth Wrapped Ether (WETH) amm
Confidence Statement
Overall assessment confidence is high (76%), reflecting stronger sample depth, better coverage, and more stable observable behavior.
Sensitivity notes
Improved transaction coverage could materially change activity-based interpretation and increase confidence.
Fresh activity could change this classification because the current signal is not recent.
Off-chain context would be particularly valuable here, the detected structural patterns raise interpretive ambiguity that on-chain data alone cannot resolve.
For analysts
Generate a Defensible Verdict Report — engine version + timestamp baked in, exportable as PDF or copy-pasted as Markdown into a SAR narrative or case file.
Run your own wallet through CredScore
Deterministic Ethereum wallet risk scoring with a full audit trail. Every signal has an explicit numeric weight, output is reproducible. Paste any wallet to see your own verdict.
First analysis is free, no credit card. Or see pricing.
Shared Jul 14, 2026