CredScore verdict
0x5a7a…b59fethereumScore
12
0 = max risk · 100 = clean
High riskEscalateConfidence:54%
Escalate for deeper review
CredScore sees a 5.6-year-old wallet with 68 transfers. High-confidence sanctions attribution and Sanctions-sensitive exposure context are severe enough to require escalation before any further interaction.
Wallet snapshot
Wallet age
5.6 years
Transfers observed
68
Last activity
6 months ago
Counterparties
25
Primary risk drivers
High-confidence sanctions attribution
This wallet itself is on a sanctions watchlist (per the curated registry or OFAC SDN sync).
Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
Sanctions-sensitive exposure context
Sanctioned counterparty interactions observed: 4 · Observed labels: Ethereum Foundation
Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
DEX-routed pass-through pattern
Single inbound source supplied 77% of inbound value · DEX + aggregator routing share: 24% of activity · Flow directionality: heavily one-sided (balance score 0.00)
A dominant share of the wallet's inbound value came from a single source, was routed through DEX or aggregator swap activity, and was drained from the wallet rather than retained. This is the laundering fingerprint observed on documented social-engineering theft cases: a large victim transfer arrives, gets fragmented into many DEX swaps to convert and obscure the asset trail, and the wallet is emptied. It is also consistent with one-shot legitimate behavior (an ICO recipient or grant payee cashing out via DEX), so it warrants review until the funding-source provenance is established.
Sanctioned counterparty interactions
Observed entity context
Labels
Ethereum Foundation
Protocols
Uniswap V3 Positions NFTEthereum FoundationUniswap UNI TokenNull / Burn Address
Offsetting factors
Established history
Wallet age: 5.6y (observed)
Observable activity present
Transfers observed: 68
Moderately distributed counterparties
Unique counterparties observed: 25
Analyst briefing
Executive Risk Verdict
This address presents elevated counterparty risk. High-confidence sanctions attribution and Sanctions-sensitive exposure context compose adverse signal severe enough to justify escalation under current coverage.
Decision Posture
Escalate for deeper review. A specific high-risk signal combination was detected (sanctions self). This pattern is materially more concerning than any individual flag in isolation and requires human context to resolve correctly.
Primary Risk Drivers
High-confidence sanctions attribution This wallet itself is on a sanctions watchlist (per the curated registry or OFAC SDN sync). Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
Sanctions-sensitive exposure context
Sanctioned counterparty interactions observed: 4
Observed labels: Ethereum Foundation
Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
DEX-routed pass-through pattern
Single inbound source supplied 77% of inbound value
DEX + aggregator routing share: 24% of activity
Flow directionality: heavily one-sided (balance score 0.00)
A dominant share of the wallet's inbound value came from a single source, was routed through DEX or aggregator swap activity, and was drained from the wallet rather than retained. This is the laundering fingerprint observed on documented social-engineering theft cases: a large victim transfer arrives, gets fragmented into many DEX swaps to convert and obscure the asset trail, and the wallet is emptied. It is also consistent with one-shot legitimate behavior (an ICO recipient or grant payee cashing out via DEX), so it warrants review until the funding-source provenance is established.
Offsetting Factors
Established history Wallet age: 5.6y (observed)
Observable activity present
Transfers observed: 68
Moderately distributed counterparties
Unique counterparties observed: 25
Structural Pattern Observations
Fan-out distribution (medium confidence) The observed flow pattern is consistent with fan-out distribution behavior and also carries additional review pressure from thin visibility, limited history, or sensitive exposure. This is not a misconduct finding, but it is not a routine pattern under current coverage.
Behavior Distribution
DEX-related interactions: 24% of observed activity. Attributed interactions: 100% of observed activity, but only 0% resolved with high confidence, the remainder are unlabeled contract interactions, which is opacity rather than meaningful attribution coverage. High-confidence attributed interactions: 0% of observed activity.
Observed Entity / Protocol Context
Ethereum Foundation
Observed Protocol Attribution
Uniswap V3 Positions NFT Ethereum Foundation Uniswap UNI Token Null / Burn Address
Confidence Statement
Overall assessment confidence is moderate (54%), reflecting partial coverage with usable but still incomplete behavioral signal.
Sensitivity notes
Improved data coverage for missing core metrics would likely improve confidence and may affect the trust score.
Off-chain context would be particularly valuable here, the detected structural patterns raise interpretive ambiguity that on-chain data alone cannot resolve.
For analysts
Generate a Defensible Verdict Report — engine version + timestamp baked in, exportable as PDF or copy-pasted as Markdown into a SAR narrative or case file.
Run your own wallet through CredScore
Deterministic Ethereum wallet risk scoring with a full audit trail. Every signal has an explicit numeric weight, output is reproducible. Paste any wallet to see your own verdict.
First analysis is free, no credit card. Or see pricing.
Shared Jul 11, 2026