CredScore verdict
0x5637…b773eth-mainnetScore
12
0 = max risk · 100 = clean
High riskEscalateConfidence:82%
Escalate for deeper review
CredScore sees a 3.2-year-old wallet with 444 transfers. Sanctions-sensitive exposure context and Dense contract interaction pattern are severe enough to require escalation before any further interaction.
Wallet snapshot
Wallet age
3.2 years
Transfers observed
444
Native balance
0.0000 ETH
Last activity
2.3 years ago
Counterparties
99
Primary risk drivers
Sanctions-sensitive exposure context
Sanctioned counterparty interactions observed: 1
Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
Dense contract interaction pattern
Unique contracts observed: 157 · Contract interaction density: 0.35
Heavy interaction with many contracts raises complexity and can increase behavioral uncertainty, although this may be normal for protocol-native wallets.
Stale recent activity
Days since last observed activity: 854
A long gap since last activity reduces the freshness of the observable signal.
Sanctioned counterparty interactions
Offsetting factors
Established history
Wallet age: 3.2y (observed)
Observable activity present
Transfers observed: 444
Moderately distributed counterparties
Unique counterparties observed: 99
Analyst briefing
Executive Risk Verdict
This address presents elevated counterparty risk. Sanctions-sensitive exposure context and Dense contract interaction pattern compose adverse signal severe enough to justify escalation under current coverage.
Decision Posture
Escalate for deeper review. A specific high-risk signal combination was detected (sanctions exposure). This pattern is materially more concerning than any individual flag in isolation and requires human context to resolve correctly.
Primary Risk Drivers
Sanctions-sensitive exposure context Sanctioned counterparty interactions observed: 1 Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
Dense contract interaction pattern
Unique contracts observed: 157
Contract interaction density: 0.35
Heavy interaction with many contracts raises complexity and can increase behavioral uncertainty, although this may be normal for protocol-native wallets.
Stale recent activity
Days since last observed activity: 854
A long gap since last activity reduces the freshness of the observable signal.
Offsetting Factors
Established history Wallet age: 3.2y (observed)
Observable activity present
Transfers observed: 444
Moderately distributed counterparties
Unique counterparties observed: 99
Behavior Distribution
Attributed interactions: 100% of observed activity, but only 0% resolved with high confidence, the remainder are unlabeled contract interactions, which is opacity rather than meaningful attribution coverage. High-confidence attributed interactions: 0% of observed activity.
Confidence Statement
Overall assessment confidence is high (82%), reflecting stronger sample depth, better coverage, and more stable observable behavior.
Sensitivity notes
Fresh activity could change this classification because the current signal is not recent.
For analysts
Generate a Defensible Verdict Report — engine version + timestamp baked in, exportable as PDF or copy-pasted as Markdown into a SAR narrative or case file.
Run your own wallet through CredScore
Deterministic Ethereum wallet risk scoring with a full audit trail. Every signal has an explicit numeric weight, output is reproducible. Paste any wallet to see your own verdict.
First analysis is free, no credit card. Or see pricing.
Shared Aug 28, 2026