CredScore verdict
0x901b…870eethereum
Score
12
0 = max risk · 100 = clean
High riskEscalateConfidence:46%
Escalate for deeper review
CredScore sees a 8.3-year-old wallet with at least 501 transfers. High-confidence sanctions attribution and History capped by fetch limit are severe enough to require escalation before any further interaction.
Wallet snapshot
Wallet age
8.3 years
Transfers observed
501
Last activity
5.1 years ago
Counterparties
2
Primary risk drivers
High-confidence sanctions attribution
This wallet itself is on a sanctions watchlist (per the curated registry or OFAC SDN sync).
Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
History capped by fetch limit
Transfers observed: At least 501 · History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 500)
Incomplete transfer coverage reduces confidence because observed totals may be lower bounds.
Balance unavailable
Native balance: Unknown
Missing core metrics reduce confidence and increase the chance of misclassification.
Sanctioned counterparty interactions
LIFSHITS
0x901bb9583b24d97e995513c6778dc6888ab6870e
OFAC_SDN · Synced from OFAC SDN CSV
Observed entity context
Labels
OFAC Sanctioned: Lazarus Group
Offsetting factors
Established history
Wallet age: 8.3y (observed)
Analyst briefing
Executive Risk Verdict
This address presents elevated counterparty risk. High-confidence sanctions attribution and History capped by fetch limit compose adverse signal severe enough to justify escalation under current coverage.
Decision Posture
Escalate for deeper review. A specific high-risk signal combination was detected (sanctions self). This pattern is materially more concerning than any individual flag in isolation and requires human context to resolve correctly.
Primary Risk Drivers
High-confidence sanctions attribution This wallet itself is on a sanctions watchlist (per the curated registry or OFAC SDN sync). Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
History capped by fetch limit
Transfers observed: At least 501
History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 500)
Incomplete transfer coverage reduces confidence because observed totals may be lower bounds.
Balance unavailable
Native balance: Unknown
Missing core metrics reduce confidence and increase the chance of misclassification.
Offsetting Factors
Established history Wallet age: 8.3y (observed)
Structural Pattern Observations
Peel-chain-like routing (medium confidence) The observed routing pattern contains characteristics consistent with peel-chain-like behavior: narrow repetitive counterparties, repeated pass-through movement, and limited routing legibility. This can reflect internal wallet operations or staged fund movement. It is not a misconduct conclusion, but it does reduce clarity and warrants closer review.
Behavior Distribution
Attributed interactions: 100% of observed activity, but only 0% resolved with high confidence, the remainder are unlabeled contract interactions, which is opacity rather than meaningful attribution coverage. High-confidence attributed interactions: 0% of observed activity.
Observed Entity / Protocol Context
OFAC Sanctioned: Lazarus Group
Confidence Statement
Overall assessment confidence is moderate (46%), reflecting partial coverage with usable but still incomplete behavioral signal.
Sensitivity notes
Improved transaction coverage could materially change activity-based interpretation and increase confidence.
Fresh activity could change this classification because the current signal is not recent.
Improved data coverage for missing core metrics would likely improve confidence and may affect the trust score.
The dormancy-reactivation pattern warrants direct inquiry, understanding what triggered resumed activity would substantially clarify the current behavioral picture.
For analysts
Generate a Defensible Verdict Report — engine version + timestamp baked in, exportable as PDF or copy-pasted as Markdown into a SAR narrative or case file.
Open report →
Run your own wallet through CredScore

Deterministic Ethereum wallet risk scoring with a full audit trail. Every signal has an explicit numeric weight, output is reproducible. Paste any wallet to see your own verdict.

First analysis is free, no credit card. Or see pricing.
Shared Jul 5, 2026