CredScore verdict
0xdd4c…3384eth-mainnetScore
4
0 = max risk · 100 = clean
High riskEscalateConfidence:76%
Escalate for deeper review
CredScore sees a 6.9-year-old wallet holding 7.4 ETH with at least 501 transfers. High-confidence sanctions attribution and Sanctions-sensitive exposure context are severe enough to require escalation before any further interaction.
Wallet snapshot
Wallet age
6.9 years
Transfers observed
501
Native balance
7.45 ETH
Last activity
1 months ago
Counterparties
214
Primary risk drivers
High-confidence sanctions attribution
This wallet itself is on a sanctions watchlist (per the curated registry or OFAC SDN sync).
Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
Sanctions-sensitive exposure context
Sanctioned counterparty interactions observed: 4 · Observed labels: OFAC Sanctioned: Tornado Cash 0.1 ETH, USDC Token, Tornado Cash
Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
Mixer/privacy interaction pattern
Mixer/privacy interactions observed: 3 · Privacy protocol observed: Tornado Cash, OFAC Sanctioned: Tornado Cash 0.1 ETH
Privacy-protocol interaction does not automatically imply illicit activity, but it materially increases review sensitivity.
Sanctioned counterparty interactions
Observed entity context
Labels
OFAC Sanctioned: Tornado Cash 0.1 ETHUSDC TokenTornado Cashtornado-cashcirclemaker
Protocols
Ethereum FoundationUniswap UNI TokenLINK token contractcircletornado-cash
Offsetting factors
Established history
Wallet age: 6.9y (observed)
Recognizable protocol attribution
Observed protocol: Ethereum Foundation · Observed protocol: Uniswap UNI Token · Observed protocol: LINK token contract
Analyst briefing
Executive Risk Verdict
This address presents elevated counterparty risk. High-confidence sanctions attribution and Sanctions-sensitive exposure context compose adverse signal severe enough to justify escalation under current coverage.
Decision Posture
Escalate for deeper review. Multiple adverse signals co-occur at sufficient intensity (adverse pressure score: 74/100). The signal combination is materially more concerning than any individual flag and requires human context to resolve correctly.
Primary Risk Drivers
High-confidence sanctions attribution This wallet itself is on a sanctions watchlist (per the curated registry or OFAC SDN sync). Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
Sanctions-sensitive exposure context
Sanctioned counterparty interactions observed: 4
Observed labels: OFAC Sanctioned: Tornado Cash 0.1 ETH, USDC Token, Tornado Cash
Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
Mixer/privacy interaction pattern
Mixer/privacy interactions observed: 3
Privacy protocol observed: Tornado Cash, OFAC Sanctioned: Tornado Cash 0.1 ETH
Privacy-protocol interaction does not automatically imply illicit activity, but it materially increases review sensitivity.
Offsetting Factors
Established history Wallet age: 6.9y (observed)
Recognizable protocol attribution
Observed protocol: Ethereum Foundation
Observed protocol: Uniswap UNI Token
Observed protocol: LINK token contract
Behavior Distribution
DEX-related interactions: 0% of observed activity. Bridge-related interactions: 1% of observed activity. Privacy-related interactions: 1% of observed activity. Attributed interactions: 100% of observed activity, but only 1% resolved with high confidence, the remainder are unlabeled contract interactions, which is opacity rather than meaningful attribution coverage. High-confidence attributed interactions: 1% of observed activity.
Observed Entity / Protocol Context
OFAC Sanctioned: Tornado Cash 0.1 ETH USDC Token Tornado Cash tornado-cash circle
Observed Protocol Attribution
Ethereum Foundation Uniswap UNI Token LINK token contract circle tornado-cash
Confidence Statement
Overall assessment confidence is high (76%), reflecting stronger sample depth, better coverage, and more stable observable behavior.
Sensitivity notes
Improved transaction coverage could materially change activity-based interpretation and increase confidence.
The dormancy-reactivation pattern warrants direct inquiry, understanding what triggered resumed activity would substantially clarify the current behavioral picture.
Signal combination pressure is elevated (74/100). Individual signals read differently in isolation; the combination is more concerning and warrants holistic review.
For analysts
Generate a Defensible Verdict Report — engine version + timestamp baked in, exportable as PDF or copy-pasted as Markdown into a SAR narrative or case file.
Run your own wallet through CredScore
Deterministic Ethereum wallet risk scoring with a full audit trail. Every signal has an explicit numeric weight, output is reproducible. Paste any wallet to see your own verdict.
First analysis is free, no credit card. Or see pricing.
Shared Jul 11, 2026