CredScore verdict
0x0085…408ceth-mainnet
Score
84
0 = max risk · 100 = clean
Low riskReviewConfidence:76%
Review before proceeding
CredScore sees a 5.4-year-old wallet with at least 362 transfers. History capped by fetch limit and Zero native balance warrant manual review before this case is treated as routine. Observed entity context: WETH Token, Sushi Router.
Wallet snapshot
Wallet age
5.4 years
Transfers observed
362
Native balance
0.0000 ETH
Last activity
3 months ago
Counterparties
177
Observed entity context
Labels
WETH TokenSushi Routersushiswapcirclewrapped-eth
Protocols
Null / Burn Addresswrapped-ethsushiswapLINK token contractcircle
Offsetting factors
Established history
Wallet age: 5.4y (observed)
Recognizable exchange or protocol context
Observed label: WETH Token · Observed label: Sushi Router · Observed label: sushiswap
Recognizable protocol attribution
Observed protocol: Null / Burn Address · Observed protocol: wrapped-eth · Observed protocol: sushiswap
Observed activity context
Signals worth knowing about, but not strong enough to change the low-risk verdict above.
History capped by fetch limit
Transfers observed: At least 362 · History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 500)
Incomplete transfer coverage reduces confidence because observed totals may be lower bounds.
Zero native balance
Native balance: 0 ETH
A zero native balance can be consistent with inactive or transient usage, which adds ambiguity.
Recognizable protocol interaction context
Observed label: WETH Token · Observed label: Sushi Router · Observed label: sushiswap
Recognizable protocol-related context improves interpretability of activity without independently proving low or high risk.
Analyst briefing
Executive Risk Verdict
This 5.4-year-old address presents lower relative counterparty risk. The observable behavior is consistent with stable usage and no dominant adverse drivers were detected, though it should still be contextualized with broader exposure intelligence when available.
Decision Posture
Review before proceeding. This case is not an automatic stop, but the current signal mix or confidence level is not strong enough to treat it as routine without human review.
Primary Risk Drivers
History capped by fetch limit Transfers observed: At least 362 History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 500) Incomplete transfer coverage reduces confidence because observed totals may be lower bounds.
Zero native balance
Native balance: 0 ETH
A zero native balance can be consistent with inactive or transient usage, which adds ambiguity.
Recognizable protocol interaction context
Observed label: WETH Token
Observed label: Sushi Router
Observed label: sushiswap
Recognizable protocol-related context improves interpretability of activity without independently proving low or high risk.
Offsetting Factors
Established history Wallet age: 5.4y (observed)
Recognizable exchange or protocol context
Observed label: WETH Token
Observed label: Sushi Router
Observed label: sushiswap
Recognizable protocol attribution
Observed protocol: Null / Burn Address
Observed protocol: wrapped-eth
Observed protocol: sushiswap
Behavior Distribution
DEX-related interactions: 1% of observed activity. Bridge-related interactions: 0% of observed activity. Attributed interactions: 100% of observed activity, but only 2% resolved with high confidence, the remainder are unlabeled contract interactions, which is opacity rather than meaningful attribution coverage. High-confidence attributed interactions: 2% of observed activity.
Normalization Context
Observed bridge activity is being treated primarily as cross-chain operational context, not as a standalone adverse signal.
DEX and router usage further support a normal DeFi execution interpretation unless paired with sensitive exposure or suspicious concentration.
Observed Entity / Protocol Context
WETH Token Sushi Router sushiswap circle wrapped-eth
Observed Protocol Attribution
Null / Burn Address wrapped-eth sushiswap LINK token contract circle
Confidence Statement
Overall assessment confidence is high (76%), reflecting stronger sample depth, better coverage, and more stable observable behavior.
Sensitivity notes
Improved transaction coverage could materially change activity-based interpretation and increase confidence.
The dormancy-reactivation pattern warrants direct inquiry, understanding what triggered resumed activity would substantially clarify the current behavioral picture.
For analysts
Generate a Defensible Verdict Report — engine version + timestamp baked in, exportable as PDF or copy-pasted as Markdown into a SAR narrative or case file.
Open report →
Run your own wallet through CredScore

Deterministic Ethereum wallet risk scoring with a full audit trail. Every signal has an explicit numeric weight, output is reproducible. Paste any wallet to see your own verdict.

First analysis is free, no credit card. Or see pricing.
Shared Jul 14, 2026