CredScore verdict
0x1b3c…a7c2eth-mainnet
Score
76
0 = max risk · 100 = clean
Low riskReviewConfidence:62%
Review before proceeding
CredScore sees one or more review-sensitive signals; this case should be manually reviewed before being treated as routine.
Wallet snapshot
Wallet age
5.8 years
Transfers observed
1,201
Native balance
133299.01 ETH
Last activity
today
Counterparties
578
Observed entity context
Labels
Null / Burn AddressUSDT contract
Protocols
Null / Burn AddressUSDT contract
Offsetting factors
Established history
Wallet age: 5.8y (observed)
Recognizable exchange or protocol context
Observed label: Null / Burn Address · Observed label: USDT contract
Recognizable protocol attribution
Observed protocol: Null / Burn Address · Observed protocol: USDT contract
Observed activity context
Signals worth knowing about, but not strong enough to change the low-risk verdict above.
History capped by fetch limit
Transfers observed: At least 1,201 · History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 1,200)
Incomplete transfer coverage reduces confidence because observed totals may be lower bounds.
High transfer activity
Transfers observed: At least 1,201 · History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 1,200)
Higher activity increases interpretive complexity, but should not be treated as adverse on its own unless paired with suspicious concentration, rapid routing, or sensitive exposure.
Recognizable entity or protocol context
Observed label: Null / Burn Address · Observed label: USDT contract
Observed counterparties and transfer metadata contain recognizable exchange or protocol context, improving analyst interpretability without by itself determining trustworthiness.
Analyst briefing
Executive Risk Verdict
This address presents lower relative counterparty risk based on generalized observable on-chain metrics. The current view is more consistent with stable observable behavior than with concentrated warning signals, though it should still be contextualized with broader exposure intelligence when available.
Decision Posture
Review before proceeding. One or more review-sensitive structural patterns were detected (Fan-out distribution), which elevates the review requirement beyond what the base risk tier alone would indicate. Human context is needed to interpret these findings correctly.
Primary Risk Drivers
History capped by fetch limit Transfers observed: At least 1,201 History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 1,200) Incomplete transfer coverage reduces confidence because observed totals may be lower bounds.
High transfer activity
Transfers observed: At least 1,201
History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 1,200)
Higher activity increases interpretive complexity, but should not be treated as adverse on its own unless paired with suspicious concentration, rapid routing, or sensitive exposure.
Recognizable entity or protocol context
Observed label: Null / Burn Address
Observed label: USDT contract
Observed counterparties and transfer metadata contain recognizable exchange or protocol context, improving analyst interpretability without by itself determining trustworthiness.
Offsetting Factors
Established history Wallet age: 5.8y (observed)
Recognizable exchange or protocol context
Observed label: Null / Burn Address
Observed label: USDT contract
Recognizable protocol attribution
Observed protocol: Null / Burn Address
Observed protocol: USDT contract
Structural Pattern Observations
Fan-out distribution (medium confidence) The observed flow pattern is consistent with fan-out distribution behavior and also carries additional review pressure from thin visibility, limited history, or sensitive exposure. This is not a misconduct finding, but it is not a routine pattern under current coverage.
Behavior Distribution
Bridge-related interactions: 1% of observed activity. Attributed interactions: 0% of observed activity. High-confidence attributed interactions: 0% of observed activity.
Normalization Context
Observed bridge activity is being treated primarily as cross-chain operational context, not as a standalone adverse signal.
Observed Entity / Protocol Context
Null / Burn Address USDT contract
Observed Protocol Attribution
Null / Burn Address USDT contract
Confidence Statement
Overall assessment confidence is moderate (62%), reflecting partial coverage with usable but still incomplete behavioral signal.
Sensitivity notes
Improved transaction coverage could materially change activity-based interpretation and increase confidence.
Stronger counterparty attribution coverage could materially improve interpretability and sharpen the current score.
Off-chain context would be particularly valuable here, the detected structural patterns raise interpretive ambiguity that on-chain data alone cannot resolve.
For analysts
Generate a Defensible Verdict Report — engine version + timestamp baked in, exportable as PDF or copy-pasted as Markdown into a SAR narrative or case file.
Open report →
Run your own wallet through CredScore

Deterministic Ethereum wallet risk scoring with a full audit trail. Every signal has an explicit numeric weight, output is reproducible. Paste any wallet to see your own verdict.

First analysis is free, no credit card. Or see pricing.
Shared Jun 6, 2026