CredScore verdict
0x4ea8…13e3eth-mainnet
Score
0
0 = max risk · 100 = clean
High riskEscalateConfidence:68%
Escalate for deeper review
CredScore sees a 5-day-old wallet with 53 transfers. Sanctions-sensitive exposure context and High-confidence sanctions attribution are severe enough to require escalation before any further interaction.
Wallet snapshot
Wallet age
5 days
Transfers observed
53
Native balance
0.0100 ETH
Last activity
5 days ago
Counterparties
11
Primary risk drivers
Sanctions-sensitive exposure context
Sanctioned counterparty interactions observed: 1 · Observed labels: Tornado Cash, transfer, tornado-cash
Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
High-confidence sanctions attribution
Sanctioned counterparty interactions observed: 1
Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
Mixer/privacy interaction pattern
Mixer/privacy interactions observed: 11 · Privacy protocol observed: Tornado Cash
Privacy-protocol interaction does not automatically imply illicit activity, but it materially increases review sensitivity.
Sanctioned counterparty interactions
Observed entity context
Labels
Tornado Cashtransfertornado-cash
Protocols
tornado-cash
Offsetting factors
Observable activity present
Transfers observed: 53
Moderately distributed counterparties
Unique counterparties observed: 11
Material attribution coverage
Attributed interaction share: 100% (21% high-confidence)
Analyst briefing
Executive Risk Verdict
This address presents elevated counterparty risk. Sanctions-sensitive exposure context and High-confidence sanctions attribution compose adverse signal severe enough to justify escalation under current coverage.
Decision Posture
Escalate for deeper review. Multiple adverse signals co-occur at sufficient intensity (adverse pressure score: 86/100). The signal combination is materially more concerning than any individual flag and requires human context to resolve correctly.
Primary Risk Drivers
Sanctions-sensitive exposure context Sanctioned counterparty interactions observed: 1 Observed labels: Tornado Cash, transfer, tornado-cash Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
High-confidence sanctions attribution
Sanctioned counterparty interactions observed: 1
Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
Mixer/privacy interaction pattern
Mixer/privacy interactions observed: 11
Privacy protocol observed: Tornado Cash
Privacy-protocol interaction does not automatically imply illicit activity, but it materially increases review sensitivity.
Offsetting Factors
Observable activity present Transfers observed: 53
Moderately distributed counterparties
Unique counterparties observed: 11
Material attribution coverage
Attributed interaction share: 100% (21% high-confidence)
Structural Pattern Observations
Fan-out distribution (medium confidence) The observed flow pattern is consistent with fan-out distribution behavior and also carries additional review pressure from thin visibility, limited history, or sensitive exposure. This is not a misconduct finding, but it is not a routine pattern under current coverage.
Behavior Distribution
Privacy-related interactions: 21% of observed activity. Attributed interactions: 100% of observed activity. High-confidence attributed interactions: 21% of observed activity.
Observed Entity / Protocol Context
Tornado Cash transfer tornado-cash
Observed Protocol Attribution
tornado-cash
Confidence Statement
Overall assessment confidence is moderate (68%), reflecting partial coverage with usable but still incomplete behavioral signal.
Sensitivity notes
As more history accumulates, this address may stabilize into a clearer behavioral profile.
Off-chain context would be particularly valuable here, the detected structural patterns raise interpretive ambiguity that on-chain data alone cannot resolve.
Signal combination pressure is elevated (86/100). Individual signals read differently in isolation; the combination is more concerning and warrants holistic review.
For analysts
Generate a Defensible Verdict Report — engine version + timestamp baked in, exportable as PDF or copy-pasted as Markdown into a SAR narrative or case file.
Open report →
Run your own wallet through CredScore

Deterministic Ethereum wallet risk scoring with a full audit trail. Every signal has an explicit numeric weight, output is reproducible. Paste any wallet to see your own verdict.

First analysis is free, no credit card. Or see pricing.
Shared Jul 27, 2026