CredScore verdict
0x1542…4443eth-mainnetScore
12
0 = max risk · 100 = clean
High riskEscalateConfidence:66%
Escalate for deeper review
CredScore sees a 1.5-year-old wallet with 44 transfers. High-confidence sanctions attribution and Funding dependency concentration are severe enough to require escalation before any further interaction.
Wallet snapshot
Wallet age
1.5 years
Transfers observed
44
Native balance
0.0952 ETH
Last activity
4 months ago
Counterparties
14
Primary risk drivers
High-confidence sanctions attribution
This wallet itself is on a sanctions watchlist (per the curated registry or OFAC SDN sync).
Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
Funding dependency concentration
Source return count: 1 · Repeated amount-band recirculation: 1 · Funding dependency concentration: 67% · Multi-hop pressure: 16/100
A large share of inbound activity appears to depend on one upstream source, which increases dependence risk and can be a precursor to distribution or circular funding patterns.
Rapid inflow pattern
Rapid inbound events observed: 20
Rapid inflow behavior can indicate burst accumulation or intermediary routing patterns that deserve review.
Observed entity context
Labels
Bybit Hack (Feb 2026, Lazarus)transferNull / Burn Address
Protocols
Null / Burn Address
Offsetting factors
Established history
Wallet age: 1.5y (observed)
Observable activity present
Transfers observed: 44
Moderately distributed counterparties
Unique counterparties observed: 14
Analyst briefing
Executive Risk Verdict
This address presents elevated counterparty risk. High-confidence sanctions attribution and Funding dependency concentration compose adverse signal severe enough to justify escalation under current coverage.
Decision Posture
Escalate for deeper review. A specific high-risk signal combination was detected (sanctions self). This pattern is materially more concerning than any individual flag in isolation and requires human context to resolve correctly.
Primary Risk Drivers
High-confidence sanctions attribution This wallet itself is on a sanctions watchlist (per the curated registry or OFAC SDN sync). Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
Funding dependency concentration
Source return count: 1
Repeated amount-band recirculation: 1
Funding dependency concentration: 67%
A large share of inbound activity appears to depend on one upstream source, which increases dependence risk and can be a precursor to distribution or circular funding patterns.
Rapid inflow pattern
Rapid inbound events observed: 20
Rapid inflow behavior can indicate burst accumulation or intermediary routing patterns that deserve review.
Offsetting Factors
Established history Wallet age: 1.5y (observed)
Observable activity present
Transfers observed: 44
Moderately distributed counterparties
Unique counterparties observed: 14
Behavior Distribution
Exchange-related interactions: 2% of observed activity. Attributed interactions: 100% of observed activity, but only 0% resolved with high confidence, the remainder are unlabeled contract interactions, which is opacity rather than meaningful attribution coverage. High-confidence attributed interactions: 0% of observed activity.
Observed Entity / Protocol Context
Bybit Hack (Feb 2026, Lazarus) transfer Null / Burn Address
Observed Protocol Attribution
Null / Burn Address
Confidence Statement
Overall assessment confidence is moderate (66%), reflecting partial coverage with usable but still incomplete behavioral signal.
Sensitivity notes
No immediate sensitivity drivers were identified from generalized metrics. Larger changes would likely come from stronger exposure and attribution intelligence.
For analysts
Generate a Defensible Verdict Report — engine version + timestamp baked in, exportable as PDF or copy-pasted as Markdown into a SAR narrative or case file.
Run your own wallet through CredScore
Deterministic Ethereum wallet risk scoring with a full audit trail. Every signal has an explicit numeric weight, output is reproducible. Paste any wallet to see your own verdict.
First analysis is free, no credit card. Or see pricing.
Shared Aug 26, 2026