CredScore verdict
0x6871…c5a0ethereumScore
80
0 = max risk · 100 = clean
Low riskReviewConfidence:54%
Review before proceeding
CredScore sees a 6.0-year-old wallet with at least 501 transfers. History capped by fetch limit and Balance unavailable warrant manual review before this case is treated as routine. Observed entity context: USDC Token, USDT Token.
Wallet snapshot
Wallet age
6.0 years
Transfers observed
501
Last activity
15 days ago
Counterparties
244
Observed entity context
Labels
USDC TokenUSDT Tokencirclemakertether
Protocols
circletetherCurve CRV TokenNull / Burn AddressBinance USD (BUSD)
Offsetting factors
Established history
Wallet age: 6.0y (observed)
Material attribution coverage
Attributed interaction share: 100% (14% high-confidence)
Recognizable exchange or protocol context
Observed label: USDC Token · Observed label: USDT Token · Observed label: circle
Observed activity context
Signals worth knowing about, but not strong enough to change the low-risk verdict above.
History capped by fetch limit
Transfers observed: At least 501 · History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 500)
Incomplete transfer coverage reduces confidence because observed totals may be lower bounds.
Balance unavailable
Native balance: Unknown
Missing core metrics reduce confidence and increase the chance of misclassification.
High transfer activity
Transfers observed: At least 501 · History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 500)
Higher activity increases interpretive complexity, but should not be treated as adverse on its own unless paired with suspicious concentration, rapid routing, or sensitive exposure.
Analyst briefing
Executive Risk Verdict
This 6.0-year-old address presents lower relative counterparty risk. The observable behavior is consistent with stable usage and no dominant adverse drivers were detected, though it should still be contextualized with broader exposure intelligence when available.
Decision Posture
Review before proceeding. This case is not an automatic stop, but the current signal mix or confidence level is not strong enough to treat it as routine without human review.
Primary Risk Drivers
History capped by fetch limit Transfers observed: At least 501 History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 500) Incomplete transfer coverage reduces confidence because observed totals may be lower bounds.
Balance unavailable
Native balance: Unknown
Missing core metrics reduce confidence and increase the chance of misclassification.
High transfer activity
Transfers observed: At least 501
History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 500)
Higher activity increases interpretive complexity, but should not be treated as adverse on its own unless paired with suspicious concentration, rapid routing, or sensitive exposure.
Offsetting Factors
Established history Wallet age: 6.0y (observed)
Material attribution coverage
Attributed interaction share: 100% (14% high-confidence)
Recognizable exchange or protocol context
Observed label: USDC Token
Observed label: USDT Token
Observed label: circle
Structural Pattern Observations
Fan-out distribution (medium confidence) The observed flow pattern is consistent with fan-out distribution behavior, where funds move outward across a broad recipient set in a compressed fashion. This can be consistent with legitimate treasury, payroll, or airdrop-style operations, but it deserves review when visibility is thin, the wallet is very new, or sensitive exposure is also present.
Behavior Distribution
Exchange-related interactions: 1% of observed activity. DEX-related interactions: 4% of observed activity. Attributed interactions: 100% of observed activity. High-confidence attributed interactions: 14% of observed activity.
Observed Entity / Protocol Context
USDC Token USDT Token circle maker tether
Observed Protocol Attribution
circle tether Curve CRV Token Null / Burn Address Binance USD (BUSD)
Confidence Statement
Overall assessment confidence is moderate (54%), reflecting partial coverage with usable but still incomplete behavioral signal.
Sensitivity notes
Improved transaction coverage could materially change activity-based interpretation and increase confidence.
Improved data coverage for missing core metrics would likely improve confidence and may affect the trust score.
For analysts
Generate a Defensible Verdict Report — engine version + timestamp baked in, exportable as PDF or copy-pasted as Markdown into a SAR narrative or case file.
Run your own wallet through CredScore
Deterministic Ethereum wallet risk scoring with a full audit trail. Every signal has an explicit numeric weight, output is reproducible. Paste any wallet to see your own verdict.
First analysis is free, no credit card. Or see pricing.
Shared Jul 12, 2026