CredScore verdict
Compared to last analysis
Jul 5, 2026 →New drivers: DEX-routed pass-through pattern
Cleared drivers: Funding dependency concentration
0xac4c…ce22ethereumScore
12
0 = max risk · 100 = clean
High riskEscalateConfidence:52%
Escalate for deeper review
CredScore sees a 3.6-year-old wallet with 44 transfers. High-confidence sanctions attribution and DEX-routed pass-through pattern are severe enough to require escalation before any further interaction.
Wallet snapshot
Wallet age
3.6 years
Transfers observed
44
Last activity
2.9 years ago
Counterparties
6
Primary risk drivers
High-confidence sanctions attribution
This wallet itself is on a sanctions watchlist (per the curated registry or OFAC SDN sync).
Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
DEX-routed pass-through pattern
Single inbound source supplied 92% of inbound value · Flow directionality: heavily one-sided (balance score 0.13)
A dominant share of the wallet's inbound value came from a single source, was routed through DEX or aggregator swap activity, and was drained from the wallet rather than retained. This is the laundering fingerprint observed on documented social-engineering theft cases: a large victim transfer arrives, gets fragmented into many DEX swaps to convert and obscure the asset trail, and the wallet is emptied. It is also consistent with one-shot legitimate behavior (an ICO recipient or grant payee cashing out via DEX), so it warrants review until the funding-source provenance is established.
High inbound value concentration
Single source supplied 92% of inbound ETH value · Distinct inbound counterparties (all assets): 3
A large share of inbound value is concentrated in a few transfers, which can indicate a single large unexplained windfall.
Sanctioned counterparty interactions
Observed entity context
Labels
USDC Tokencircle
Protocols
circle
Offsetting factors
Established history
Wallet age: 3.6y (observed)
Observable activity present
Transfers observed: 44
Moderately distributed counterparties
Unique counterparties observed: 6
Analyst briefing
Executive Risk Verdict
This address presents elevated counterparty risk. High-confidence sanctions attribution and DEX-routed pass-through pattern compose adverse signal severe enough to justify escalation under current coverage.
Decision Posture
Escalate for deeper review. A specific high-risk signal combination was detected (sanctions self). This pattern is materially more concerning than any individual flag in isolation and requires human context to resolve correctly.
Primary Risk Drivers
High-confidence sanctions attribution This wallet itself is on a sanctions watchlist (per the curated registry or OFAC SDN sync). Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
DEX-routed pass-through pattern
Single inbound source supplied 92% of inbound value
Flow directionality: heavily one-sided (balance score 0.13)
A dominant share of the wallet's inbound value came from a single source, was routed through DEX or aggregator swap activity, and was drained from the wallet rather than retained. This is the laundering fingerprint observed on documented social-engineering theft cases: a large victim transfer arrives, gets fragmented into many DEX swaps to convert and obscure the asset trail, and the wallet is emptied. It is also consistent with one-shot legitimate behavior (an ICO recipient or grant payee cashing out via DEX), so it warrants review until the funding-source provenance is established.
High inbound value concentration
Single source supplied 92% of inbound ETH value
Distinct inbound counterparties (all assets): 3
A large share of inbound value is concentrated in a few transfers, which can indicate a single large unexplained windfall.
Offsetting Factors
Established history Wallet age: 3.6y (observed)
Observable activity present
Transfers observed: 44
Moderately distributed counterparties
Unique counterparties observed: 6
Behavior Distribution
Exchange-related interactions: 50% of observed activity. Attributed interactions: 100% of observed activity. High-confidence attributed interactions: 27% of observed activity.
Observed Entity / Protocol Context
USDC Token circle
Observed Protocol Attribution
circle
Confidence Statement
Overall assessment confidence is moderate (52%), reflecting partial coverage with usable but still incomplete behavioral signal.
Sensitivity notes
Fresh activity could change this classification because the current signal is not recent.
Improved data coverage for missing core metrics would likely improve confidence and may affect the trust score.
For analysts
Generate a Defensible Verdict Report — engine version + timestamp baked in, exportable as PDF or copy-pasted as Markdown into a SAR narrative or case file.
Run your own wallet through CredScore
Deterministic Ethereum wallet risk scoring with a full audit trail. Every signal has an explicit numeric weight, output is reproducible. Paste any wallet to see your own verdict.
First analysis is free, no credit card. Or see pricing.
Shared Jul 11, 2026