CredScore verdict
0x8d0b…d841ethereumScore
72
0 = max risk · 100 = clean
Low riskReviewConfidence:50%
Review before proceeding
CredScore sees a 1.6-year-old wallet with at least 501 transfers. History capped by fetch limit and Balance unavailable warrant manual review before this case is treated as routine. Observed entity context: transferFrom, transfer.
Wallet snapshot
Wallet age
1.6 years
Transfers observed
501
Last activity
3 months ago
Counterparties
166
Observed entity context
Labels
transferFromtransferWrapped Ether (WETH)
Protocols
Wrapped Ether (WETH)USDT contract
Offsetting factors
Established history
Wallet age: 1.6y (observed)
Recognizable exchange or protocol context
Observed label: transferFrom · Observed label: transfer · Observed label: Wrapped Ether (WETH)
Recognizable protocol attribution
Observed protocol: Wrapped Ether (WETH) · Observed protocol: USDT contract
Observed activity context
Signals worth knowing about, but not strong enough to change the low-risk verdict above.
History capped by fetch limit
Transfers observed: At least 501 · History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 500)
Incomplete transfer coverage reduces confidence because observed totals may be lower bounds.
Balance unavailable
Native balance: Unknown
Missing core metrics reduce confidence and increase the chance of misclassification.
High transfer activity
Transfers observed: At least 501 · History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 500)
Higher activity increases interpretive complexity, but should not be treated as adverse on its own unless paired with suspicious concentration, rapid routing, or sensitive exposure.
Analyst briefing
Executive Risk Verdict
This 1.6-year-old address presents lower relative counterparty risk. The observable behavior is consistent with stable usage and no dominant adverse drivers were detected, though it should still be contextualized with broader exposure intelligence when available.
Decision Posture
Review before proceeding. One or more review-sensitive structural patterns were detected (Fan-out distribution), which elevates the review requirement beyond what the base risk tier alone would indicate. Human context is needed to interpret these findings correctly.
Primary Risk Drivers
History capped by fetch limit Transfers observed: At least 501 History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 500) Incomplete transfer coverage reduces confidence because observed totals may be lower bounds.
Balance unavailable
Native balance: Unknown
Missing core metrics reduce confidence and increase the chance of misclassification.
High transfer activity
Transfers observed: At least 501
History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 500)
Higher activity increases interpretive complexity, but should not be treated as adverse on its own unless paired with suspicious concentration, rapid routing, or sensitive exposure.
Offsetting Factors
Established history Wallet age: 1.6y (observed)
Recognizable exchange or protocol context
Observed label: transferFrom
Observed label: transfer
Observed label: Wrapped Ether (WETH)
Recognizable protocol attribution
Observed protocol: Wrapped Ether (WETH)
Observed protocol: USDT contract
Structural Pattern Observations
Fan-out distribution (medium confidence) The observed flow pattern is consistent with fan-out distribution behavior and also carries additional review pressure from thin visibility, limited history, or sensitive exposure. This is not a misconduct finding, but it is not a routine pattern under current coverage.
Behavior Distribution
Attributed interactions: 100% of observed activity, but only 0% resolved with high confidence, the remainder are unlabeled contract interactions, which is opacity rather than meaningful attribution coverage. High-confidence attributed interactions: 0% of observed activity.
Observed Entity / Protocol Context
transferFrom transfer Wrapped Ether (WETH)
Observed Protocol Attribution
Wrapped Ether (WETH) USDT contract
Confidence Statement
Overall assessment confidence is moderate (50%), reflecting partial coverage with usable but still incomplete behavioral signal.
Sensitivity notes
Improved transaction coverage could materially change activity-based interpretation and increase confidence.
Improved data coverage for missing core metrics would likely improve confidence and may affect the trust score.
Off-chain context would be particularly valuable here, the detected structural patterns raise interpretive ambiguity that on-chain data alone cannot resolve.
The dormancy-reactivation pattern warrants direct inquiry, understanding what triggered resumed activity would substantially clarify the current behavioral picture.
For analysts
Generate a Defensible Verdict Report — engine version + timestamp baked in, exportable as PDF or copy-pasted as Markdown into a SAR narrative or case file.
Run your own wallet through CredScore
Deterministic Ethereum wallet risk scoring with a full audit trail. Every signal has an explicit numeric weight, output is reproducible. Paste any wallet to see your own verdict.
First analysis is free, no credit card. Or see pricing.
Shared Jul 11, 2026