CredScore verdict
0x6245…4305ethereumScore
12
0 = max risk · 100 = clean
High riskEscalateConfidence:58%
Escalate for deeper review
CredScore sees a 8.4-year-old wallet with 151 transfers. Sanctions-sensitive exposure context and High-confidence sanctions attribution are severe enough to require escalation before any further interaction.
Wallet snapshot
Wallet age
8.4 years
Transfers observed
151
Last activity
1.5 years ago
Counterparties
64
Primary risk drivers
Sanctions-sensitive exposure context
Sanctioned counterparty interactions observed: 1 · Observed labels: USDT Token, 1inch, tether
Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
High-confidence sanctions attribution
Sanctioned counterparty interactions observed: 1
Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
High inbound value concentration
Single source supplied 91% of inbound ETH value · Distinct inbound counterparties (all assets): 23
A large share of inbound value is concentrated in a few transfers, which can indicate a single large unexplained windfall.
Sanctioned counterparty interactions
OFAC SDN-listed address
0x8576acc5c05d6ce88f4e49bf65bdf0c62f91353c ↗OFAC_SDN · OFAC SDN ETH list (maintained mirror); not present in truncated CSV
Observed entity context
Labels
USDT Token1inchtether1inch Router
Protocols
tetherUSDT contractNull / Burn Address1inch
Offsetting factors
Established history
Wallet age: 8.4y (observed)
Observable activity present
Transfers observed: 151
Moderately distributed counterparties
Unique counterparties observed: 64
Analyst briefing
Executive Risk Verdict
This address presents elevated counterparty risk. Sanctions-sensitive exposure context and High-confidence sanctions attribution compose adverse signal severe enough to justify escalation under current coverage.
Decision Posture
Escalate for deeper review. A specific high-risk signal combination was detected (sanctions self). This pattern is materially more concerning than any individual flag in isolation and requires human context to resolve correctly.
Primary Risk Drivers
Sanctions-sensitive exposure context Sanctioned counterparty interactions observed: 1 Observed labels: USDT Token, 1inch, tether Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
High-confidence sanctions attribution
Sanctioned counterparty interactions observed: 1
Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
High inbound value concentration
Single source supplied 91% of inbound ETH value
Distinct inbound counterparties (all assets): 23
A large share of inbound value is concentrated in a few transfers, which can indicate a single large unexplained windfall.
Offsetting Factors
Established history Wallet age: 8.4y (observed)
Observable activity present
Transfers observed: 151
Moderately distributed counterparties
Unique counterparties observed: 64
Structural Pattern Observations
Fan-out distribution (medium confidence) The observed flow pattern is consistent with fan-out distribution behavior and also carries additional review pressure from thin visibility, limited history, or sensitive exposure. This is not a misconduct finding, but it is not a routine pattern under current coverage.
Behavior Distribution
DEX-related interactions: 1% of observed activity. Router / aggregator interactions: 1% of observed activity. Attributed interactions: 100% of observed activity. High-confidence attributed interactions: 11% of observed activity.
Observed Entity / Protocol Context
USDT Token 1inch tether 1inch Router
Observed Protocol Attribution
tether USDT contract Null / Burn Address 1inch
Confidence Statement
Overall assessment confidence is moderate (58%), reflecting partial coverage with usable but still incomplete behavioral signal.
Sensitivity notes
Fresh activity could change this classification because the current signal is not recent.
Improved data coverage for missing core metrics would likely improve confidence and may affect the trust score.
Off-chain context would be particularly valuable here, the detected structural patterns raise interpretive ambiguity that on-chain data alone cannot resolve.
The dormancy-reactivation pattern warrants direct inquiry, understanding what triggered resumed activity would substantially clarify the current behavioral picture.
For analysts
Generate a Defensible Verdict Report — engine version + timestamp baked in, exportable as PDF or copy-pasted as Markdown into a SAR narrative or case file.
Run your own wallet through CredScore
Deterministic Ethereum wallet risk scoring with a full audit trail. Every signal has an explicit numeric weight, output is reproducible. Paste any wallet to see your own verdict.
First analysis is free, no credit card. Or see pricing.
Shared Jul 12, 2026