CredScore verdict
0x837f…e90ceth-mainnetScore
45
0 = max risk · 100 = clean
Medium riskReviewConfidence:76%
Review before proceeding
CredScore sees a 5.8-year-old wallet with at least 218 transfers. DEX-routed pass-through pattern and History capped by fetch limit warrant manual review before this case is treated as routine. Observed entity context: Uniswap Universal Router, USDT Token.
Wallet snapshot
Wallet age
5.8 years
Transfers observed
218
Native balance
0.2608 ETH
Last activity
4 months ago
Counterparties
59
Primary risk drivers
DEX-routed pass-through pattern
Single inbound source supplied 79% of inbound value · DEX + aggregator routing share: 21% of activity · Flow directionality: heavily one-sided (balance score 0.00)
A dominant share of the wallet's inbound value came from a single source, was routed through DEX or aggregator swap activity, and was drained from the wallet rather than retained. This is the laundering fingerprint observed on documented social-engineering theft cases: a large victim transfer arrives, gets fragmented into many DEX swaps to convert and obscure the asset trail, and the wallet is emptied. It is also consistent with one-shot legitimate behavior (an ICO recipient or grant payee cashing out via DEX), so it warrants review until the funding-source provenance is established.
History capped by fetch limit
Transfers observed: At least 218 · History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 500)
Incomplete transfer coverage reduces confidence because observed totals may be lower bounds.
Source return flow detected
Circular loop count: 1 · Source return count: 7 · Linked recirculating counterparties: 1 · Bidirectional cluster count: 1
Observed sources later reappear as return destinations, which reduces legibility and suggests recirculating flow rather than clean one-direction settlement.
Observed entity context
Labels
Uniswap Universal RouterUSDT Tokencowmetamasktether
Protocols
uniswaptethermetamaskLINK token contractcow
Offsetting factors
Established history
Wallet age: 5.8y (observed)
Moderately distributed counterparties
Unique counterparties observed: 59
Material attribution coverage
Attributed interaction share: 100% (12% high-confidence)
Analyst briefing
Executive Risk Verdict
This 5.8-year-old address presents moderate counterparty risk. The leading concerns are DEX-routed pass-through pattern and History capped by fetch limit, which warrant manual review before this case is treated as routine.
Decision Posture
Review before proceeding. This case is not an automatic stop, but the current signal mix or confidence level is not strong enough to treat it as routine without human review.
Primary Risk Drivers
DEX-routed pass-through pattern Single inbound source supplied 79% of inbound value DEX + aggregator routing share: 21% of activity Flow directionality: heavily one-sided (balance score 0.00) A dominant share of the wallet's inbound value came from a single source, was routed through DEX or aggregator swap activity, and was drained from the wallet rather than retained. This is the laundering fingerprint observed on documented social-engineering theft cases: a large victim transfer arrives, gets fragmented into many DEX swaps to convert and obscure the asset trail, and the wallet is emptied. It is also consistent with one-shot legitimate behavior (an ICO recipient or grant payee cashing out via DEX), so it warrants review until the funding-source provenance is established.
History capped by fetch limit
Transfers observed: At least 218
History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 500)
Incomplete transfer coverage reduces confidence because observed totals may be lower bounds.
Source return flow detected
Circular loop count: 1
Source return count: 7
Linked recirculating counterparties: 1
Observed sources later reappear as return destinations, which reduces legibility and suggests recirculating flow rather than clean one-direction settlement.
Offsetting Factors
Established history Wallet age: 5.8y (observed)
Moderately distributed counterparties
Unique counterparties observed: 59
Material attribution coverage
Attributed interaction share: 100% (12% high-confidence)
Behavior Distribution
Exchange-related interactions: 0% of observed activity. DEX-related interactions: 11% of observed activity. Router / aggregator interactions: 11% of observed activity. Attributed interactions: 100% of observed activity. High-confidence attributed interactions: 12% of observed activity.
Observed Entity / Protocol Context
Uniswap Universal Router USDT Token cow metamask tether
Observed Protocol Attribution
uniswap tether metamask LINK token contract cow
Confidence Statement
Overall assessment confidence is high (76%), reflecting stronger sample depth, better coverage, and more stable observable behavior.
Sensitivity notes
Improved transaction coverage could materially change activity-based interpretation and increase confidence.
For analysts
Generate a Defensible Verdict Report — engine version + timestamp baked in, exportable as PDF or copy-pasted as Markdown into a SAR narrative or case file.
Run your own wallet through CredScore
Deterministic Ethereum wallet risk scoring with a full audit trail. Every signal has an explicit numeric weight, output is reproducible. Paste any wallet to see your own verdict.
First analysis is free, no credit card. Or see pricing.
Shared Jul 14, 2026