CredScore verdict
0xdbae…b973ethereumScore
12
0 = max risk · 100 = clean
High riskEscalateConfidence:52%
Escalate for deeper review
CredScore sees a 2.8-year-old wallet with 33 transfers. Sanctions-sensitive exposure context and High-confidence sanctions attribution are severe enough to require escalation before any further interaction.
Wallet snapshot
Wallet age
2.8 years
Transfers observed
33
Last activity
1.3 years ago
Counterparties
18
Primary risk drivers
Sanctions-sensitive exposure context
Sanctioned counterparty interactions observed: 5 · Observed labels: USDT Token, DAI Token, USDC Token
Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
High-confidence sanctions attribution
Sanctioned counterparty interactions observed: 5
Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
Balance unavailable
Native balance: Unknown
Missing core metrics reduce confidence and increase the chance of misclassification.
Sanctioned counterparty interactions
Observed entity context
Labels
USDT TokenDAI TokenUSDC Tokencirclemaker
Protocols
tethermakerUSDT contractcircle
Offsetting factors
Established history
Wallet age: 2.8y (observed)
Observable activity present
Transfers observed: 33
Moderately distributed counterparties
Unique counterparties observed: 18
Analyst briefing
Executive Risk Verdict
This address presents elevated counterparty risk. Sanctions-sensitive exposure context and High-confidence sanctions attribution compose adverse signal severe enough to justify escalation under current coverage.
Decision Posture
Escalate for deeper review. A specific high-risk signal combination was detected (sanctions self). This pattern is materially more concerning than any individual flag in isolation and requires human context to resolve correctly.
Primary Risk Drivers
Sanctions-sensitive exposure context Sanctioned counterparty interactions observed: 5 Observed labels: USDT Token, DAI Token, USDC Token Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
High-confidence sanctions attribution
Sanctioned counterparty interactions observed: 5
Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
Balance unavailable
Native balance: Unknown
Missing core metrics reduce confidence and increase the chance of misclassification.
Offsetting Factors
Established history Wallet age: 2.8y (observed)
Observable activity present
Transfers observed: 33
Moderately distributed counterparties
Unique counterparties observed: 18
Behavior Distribution
Attributed interactions: 100% of observed activity. High-confidence attributed interactions: 24% of observed activity.
Observed Entity / Protocol Context
USDT Token DAI Token USDC Token circle maker
Observed Protocol Attribution
tether maker USDT contract circle
Confidence Statement
Overall assessment confidence is moderate (52%), reflecting partial coverage with usable but still incomplete behavioral signal.
Sensitivity notes
Fresh activity could change this classification because the current signal is not recent.
Improved data coverage for missing core metrics would likely improve confidence and may affect the trust score.
For analysts
Generate a Defensible Verdict Report — engine version + timestamp baked in, exportable as PDF or copy-pasted as Markdown into a SAR narrative or case file.
Run your own wallet through CredScore
Deterministic Ethereum wallet risk scoring with a full audit trail. Every signal has an explicit numeric weight, output is reproducible. Paste any wallet to see your own verdict.
First analysis is free, no credit card. Or see pricing.
Shared Jul 11, 2026