CredScore verdict
Compared to last analysis
Jul 5, 2026 →Score
-38
riskier
Tier
Unknown → High
Posture
— → Escalate
New drivers: High-confidence sanctions attribution, History capped by fetch limit, Balance unavailable
0xd850…e10eethereumScore
12
0 = max risk · 100 = clean
High riskEscalateConfidence:58%
Escalate for deeper review
CredScore sees a 2.8-year-old wallet with at least 501 transfers. High-confidence sanctions attribution and History capped by fetch limit are severe enough to require escalation before any further interaction.
Wallet snapshot
Wallet age
2.8 years
Transfers observed
501
Last activity
1.3 years ago
Counterparties
155
Primary risk drivers
High-confidence sanctions attribution
This wallet itself is on a sanctions watchlist (per the curated registry or OFAC SDN sync).
Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
History capped by fetch limit
Transfers observed: At least 501 · History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 500)
Incomplete transfer coverage reduces confidence because observed totals may be lower bounds.
Balance unavailable
Native balance: Unknown
Missing core metrics reduce confidence and increase the chance of misclassification.
Sanctioned counterparty interactions
Observed entity context
Labels
USDT TokencirclemakertetherDAI Token
Protocols
tetherUSDT contractcirclemakerUSDC contract
Offsetting factors
Established history
Wallet age: 2.8y (observed)
Material attribution coverage
Attributed interaction share: 100% (26% high-confidence)
High-confidence label coverage
High-confidence attributed share: 26%
Analyst briefing
Executive Risk Verdict
This address presents elevated counterparty risk. High-confidence sanctions attribution and History capped by fetch limit compose adverse signal severe enough to justify escalation under current coverage.
Decision Posture
Escalate for deeper review. A specific high-risk signal combination was detected (sanctions self). This pattern is materially more concerning than any individual flag in isolation and requires human context to resolve correctly.
Primary Risk Drivers
High-confidence sanctions attribution This wallet itself is on a sanctions watchlist (per the curated registry or OFAC SDN sync). Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
History capped by fetch limit
Transfers observed: At least 501
History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 500)
Incomplete transfer coverage reduces confidence because observed totals may be lower bounds.
Balance unavailable
Native balance: Unknown
Missing core metrics reduce confidence and increase the chance of misclassification.
Offsetting Factors
Established history Wallet age: 2.8y (observed)
Material attribution coverage
Attributed interaction share: 100% (26% high-confidence)
High-confidence label coverage
High-confidence attributed share: 26%
Structural Pattern Observations
Fan-out distribution (medium confidence) The observed flow pattern is consistent with fan-out distribution behavior, where funds move outward across a broad recipient set in a compressed fashion. This can be consistent with legitimate treasury, payroll, or airdrop-style operations, but it deserves review when visibility is thin, the wallet is very new, or sensitive exposure is also present.
Behavior Distribution
Attributed interactions: 100% of observed activity. High-confidence attributed interactions: 26% of observed activity.
Observed Entity / Protocol Context
USDT Token circle maker tether DAI Token
Observed Protocol Attribution
tether USDT contract circle maker USDC contract
Confidence Statement
Overall assessment confidence is moderate (58%), reflecting partial coverage with usable but still incomplete behavioral signal.
Sensitivity notes
Improved transaction coverage could materially change activity-based interpretation and increase confidence.
Fresh activity could change this classification because the current signal is not recent.
Improved data coverage for missing core metrics would likely improve confidence and may affect the trust score.
For analysts
Generate a Defensible Verdict Report — engine version + timestamp baked in, exportable as PDF or copy-pasted as Markdown into a SAR narrative or case file.
Run your own wallet through CredScore
Deterministic Ethereum wallet risk scoring with a full audit trail. Every signal has an explicit numeric weight, output is reproducible. Paste any wallet to see your own verdict.
First analysis is free, no credit card. Or see pricing.
Shared Jul 11, 2026